Mate

tremorlaine · 10-06-2012, 11:15 PM

Our playgroup just had a 30 minute debate/argument. Even though I argued the loudest they aren't satisfied. Here is the scenario.

Scary Clowns was played (Level 9, 3 treasures). Enraged was played on it. (+5, +1 treasure). Mate was then played. We agreed that it then became a combined Level 28 creature. The sticking point was the +1 treasure from the Enraged card. Half the table argued that the final result of the combat was that the combined creature gave 2 levels and 7 treasures. The other half argued that is should be 2 levels and 8 treasures.

The disagreement was the text of Mate where the 7 treasure group said the Monster Enhancer meant the +5 enhancement only and not the 1 treasure was duplicated.

The other group said that it duplicated the Monster Enhancer in its entirety.

Which is the correct answer?

10-06-2012, 11:15 PM	#1
tremorlaine Join Date: Oct 2012	Mate Our playgroup just had a 30 minute debate/argument. Even though I argued the loudest they aren't satisfied. Here is the scenario. Scary Clowns was played (Level 9, 3 treasures). Enraged was played on it. (+5, +1 treasure). Mate was then played. We agreed that it then became a combined Level 28 creature. The sticking point was the +1 treasure from the Enraged card. Half the table argued that the final result of the combat was that the combined creature gave 2 levels and 7 treasures. The other half argued that is should be 2 levels and 8 treasures. The disagreement was the text of Mate where the 7 treasure group said the Monster Enhancer meant the +5 enhancement only and not the 1 treasure was duplicated. The other group said that it duplicated the Monster Enhancer in its entirety. Which is the correct answer?