|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Denmark
|
During a match against some friends loud arguments couldn't settle a dispute, even if the owner of the game (me) wanted to overrule the dispute with what he thought was logical consistency.
Dispute over (supposed) logical (in)consistency: If a monster has +6 bonus against elves, but the player who faced the monster is not an elf, and he gets help from one who is elf. Does the bonus count against the elf? (And does it count against the elf only?) If it does, what would happen if an elf face a monster who has +6 against elves, and then receives help from another player? Why would the bonus then count against the helper even if that helper is *not* an elf? I suggested that logical consistency could not permid both to be true. If my view is false, please explain why. And I can't understand why I would be the first in the world to spot that inviting contradiction. Regards from a ghost hacker (And then I want to complain that a word like "against" can't be a tag to this thread. I insist that the word against can be a tag to this thread!) |
|
|
|
| Tags |
| bonus, class, logic, race |
|
|