Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-24-2012, 09:01 AM   #1
wellspring
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Default Unofficial Ultra Tech errata thread

This is the thread where we will compile proposed errata to Ultra Tech. This is intended to put it all together into one place where it will be easy for SJ Games to review and add to the official errata.

What we don't want:
  • Anything new. New gear, new options and modes for existing gear, etc.
  • Changes to rules that change their substance. Errata is intended to fix mistakes, not revise material. This is sometimes a judgment call. If a change requires more than a line or so of text changes, then it probably doesn't belong here.
  • Complaints about existing rules. We want solutions, not problems.

Errata are typos (already mostly fixed) or stat-line issues that can be easily remedied. Big changes, or changes likely to trickle down to other published material or already-running games, belong in Pyramid articles or e23 supplements (there are already several very good ones). More importantly, changes that require big changes to the Ultra Tech document aren't likely to make it in anyway.

The goal of this thread is to make it as easy and painless as humanly possible to get UT polished up. It's a labor of love from fans.
wellspring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2012, 09:02 AM   #2
wellspring
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Default Re: Unofficial Ultra Tech errata thread

Reserved

This is where final errata will go.
wellspring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2012, 09:03 AM   #3
wellspring
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Default Re: Unofficial Ultra Tech errata thread

Reserved

This post is where iffy errata will be parked.

(By "iffy", I mean changes that aren't totally no-brainers.)
wellspring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2012, 09:06 AM   #4
wellspring
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Default Re: Unofficial Ultra Tech errata thread

Reserved

I don't know why I'm reserving a third reply, but I'm sure it will come in handy.

Fun thought: What separates strategy from tactics is path dependence. When a good long-run outcome comes from something other than a series of good short-runs, then you have strategy.
wellspring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2012, 09:25 AM   #5
wellspring
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Default Re: Unofficial Ultra Tech errata thread

I'll kick things off.

(Thanks Ectropy) The surveillance worm (p105) is listed as 2" by .1" and 2 lbs. This is way too heavy for its intended purpose and nonsensically dense. Based on the Size Modifier rules, there are three possible resolutions:
  1. The worm is 2' by 0.1'. The notation meant feet, not inches. (A Nigel Tufnel typo...).
  2. The worm's dimensions are correct, but the weight should be 0.002 lbs (or neg.), not 2 lbs. This is consistent with the SM table.
  3. The worm's dimensions are correct, but the weight should be .01 lbs, not 2 lbs. This is consistent with the similarly-sized robobug later in the chapter.
wellspring is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2012, 04:13 PM   #6
jhite
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Massachusetts
Default Re: Unofficial Ultra Tech errata thread

I don't actually have a solution, but I think I've found an item in need of clarification for the errata, at least:

On p.56, the entry for Memory Augmentation AR programs seems to lack a market price.

Unless I'm just blind, of course.
jhite is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
errata, ultra-tech, ultratech


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.