|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
|
Quote:
Actually I just got classic Munchkin and was introduced to the whole choosing ones sex and we sort of sneered at that as well. We got pretty strong opinons about gender roles- but at the same time we are pretty understanding. I mean, it's a losing battle to get annoyed when sites don't offer options for transgendered or gender-queer etc. The huge breasted sexually glorified women in these game however- not cool. edit= You should probably make this into a new thread Last edited by stopyelling; 09-23-2011 at 04:23 PM. Reason: New Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Snoqualmie, WA
|
To be fair, the genre from which Munchkin originates is where this comes from - take a look at any fantasy artwork that adorns the pages of 2nd Edition D&D books, and it's very quickly obvious that there's a gender bias.
__________________
Fantasy 1/2/3/4/5/6/7-MGC,7-CWBH, MfD, FD, WfS, RG, SR, Reloaded, Munchkinomicon, Conan
Axe Cop | Booty, Fish & Ships | Cthulhu 1/2/3 | Zombies | Cthulhu Dice | Zombie Dice Android Level Counter Last edited by snarky; 09-23-2011 at 11:15 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
|
Ya we all get that. We just sort of have to 'deal'.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South Dakota
|
Quote:
So you aren't bothered by the overly-muscled guys? Or the stereotypes about thieves, wizards, monsters, etc? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Munchkin Line Editor
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
|
As suggested, I've split this into a separate thread.
I urge everyone to keep your language temperate and to be respectful of other posters. The moderators WILL hand out infraction points for trolling or flamage, and we WILL NOT hesistate to ban people who can't play nicely. Speaking only in terms of the game itself: You are required to pick a sex in those sets that have sex-based effects (Zombies and Axe Cop do not, at least at present). While the standard rule is "You start off as your sex," we have gone on record as declining to challenge people on this declaration. An unfamiliar person who appears male but declares female should be considered female for game purposes and it is rude to subject her (or him) to an inquisition on the matter. What you cannot do is arbitrarily change mid-game.
__________________
Andrew Hackard, Munchkin Line Editor If you have a question that isn't getting answered, we have a thread for that. Let people like what they like. Don't be a gamer hater. #PlayMunchkin on social media: Twitter || Facebook || Instagram || YouTube Follow us on Kickstarter: Steve Jackson Games and Warehouse 23 Last edited by Andrew Hackard; 09-23-2011 at 11:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
|
Quote:
We get that the game no accommodating to gender queer is not exactly rude or insensitive. It's a just game a gimmick. Like Alliance/Horde. (Though WOW not offering such things ..maybe a different issue...) Really we get that in the digital world, you hit well over 95% of the market by not including close captions, brail, gener conscious etc. It makes sense. It would just be nice. The art style however.. not so much. Again, it's not exactly BAD- but it's just in a 'different' taste. Not my groups taste sure. It just makes us all roll our eyes. I hope I don't seem insensitive but like, the women in these drawings are clearly over the top sexualized. A joke I assume on other fantasy art. But every women? In every Munchkin game (maybe, don't own them all)? In every instance? If his art wasn't so cartoonish, maybe I could say 'well at least it's appealing' but since it's so characterized, it's just sexist. This goes back to sexists as per the style of the genre. Ya. But that should loop back to what I said above- every girl? every game (so far)? Really, we don't got a HUGE issue with it. But it just makes the women in my group (my group are all women and gender queer except me) sort of roll their eyes. Don't mean to be rude .. I think I have a valid observation.. I really apologize if I crossed any lines. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
|
Quote:
My real question is why not female 'Dorks' for some of the female characters. So far all women I've found are blatantly over sexualized. (Though very likely have missed some and have not checked all but at least most) (Like I just recalled the Female Atomic Zombie! Oh ya!) In response to other stereotypes or jabs at them, well ya. That's okay. Wariors are all beefy sure. Warior = Strong = Beefy. I dig it. Have you seem the Amazon card? The Leather Armor card? And others I cant think off hand? Well maybe not the leather armor card. i get it. Leather Armor. BDSM. Ya I see it. I really should do research before talking. Quote:
It's just how the game asks to pick the sex you are. That's all REALLY. Everything else just you know- hit close to home. |
||
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South Dakota
|
I think you may be seeing a problem that isn't there.
That rule is there to prevent people from arguing what gender thery are later on in the game when its applicable. Which doesn't happen all that often. Monster effects, weapons, etc. The game doesn't need extra genders. Either you are male or you are female. If you wanted to house-rule that the cards that say "only opposite gender may help" is now any gender may, thats up to you. "My real question is why not female 'Dorks' for some of the female characters. So far all women I've found are blatantly over sexualized. (Though very likely have missed some and have not checked all but at least most)" Makes it easier to tell what gender they are supposed to be for one. Not a lot of room on the card. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Join Date: May 2010
|
When I get the leather armor card my wife often comments that I should be made to dress in the outfit. I'm not sure that she is joking! I am sure our son will need a lot of counselling after these comments during the game. one game every single item I had and class card had female picture. Guess it is the group you play with. We try not to take it seriously.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Wow, this was an education. I looked up "gender-queer", because I had never, ever heard the term, and couldn't figure out what the issue was. I thought that, even among the transgender, people would pick a gender and stick with it, and so would simply, for game purposes, use whatever gender they identified as. I was totally unaware (though I guess I shouldn't be surprised) that some people somehow believe that gender is a fluid characteristic, and that people can be either, both, or neither, and go back and forth as they choose.
Pretty sure that belief doesn't fit with the actual definition of the word "gender" as found in the dictionary, not without stretching it to almost unrecognizeability,though, so I'm not sure one has much basis for criticizing others for not making special efforts to accomodate such a new definition in something as simple as game rules designed to define effects based on the binary gender setup standard to said game. For game purposes, having such a fluid vision of gender would constitute cheating, since it would allow one to decide on their own whether gender-based cards and card effects were applicable to them on a case-by-case basis. Last edited by Mister Ed; 09-24-2011 at 07:46 AM. |
|
|
![]() |
|
|