[LT] Why specifics about helmets and neck? - Page 3

LazarusDarkeyes · 07-20-2011, 07:47 PM

In Low-Tech, why are so many specific examples given for head and neck protection? Are they supposed to be exhaustive lists?? No other body parts seem to have received so much detail... Why wasn't the hit location+armor type formula used elsewhere sufficient?

Oh yeah! And what hit locations 'make sense' to allow only frontal/rear armor?
skull/face/neck/torso/thighs/shins make sense to me, but I'm unsure of hands/feet/andy part of arms/knee/groin...

07-20-2011, 07:47 PM	#1
LazarusDarkeyes Join Date: Apr 2006	[LT] Why specifics about helmets and neck? In Low-Tech, why are so many specific examples given for head and neck protection? Are they supposed to be exhaustive lists?? No other body parts seem to have received so much detail... Why wasn't the hit location+armor type formula used elsewhere sufficient? Oh yeah! And what hit locations 'make sense' to allow only frontal/rear armor? skull/face/neck/torso/thighs/shins make sense to me, but I'm unsure of hands/feet/andy part of arms/knee/groin... Last edited by LazarusDarkeyes; 07-20-2011 at 07:55 PM.