Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-09-2010, 10:48 AM   #1
the_seeker
.
 
the_seeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC, United States
Default Short Swords vs Long Knives

Fortunately, the Official GURPS FAQ had an entry for precisely this topic.
Unfortunately, that entry wasn't very helpful to me even though I have Martial Arts.
I am therefore appealing to the Hive Mind for assistance dealing with my issue.

Martial Arts defines a shortsword as "a one-handed cut-and-thrust sword between 18 and 24 inches long" (p223), and I interpret that to mean 4 to 6 inches of hilt and 14 to 20 inches of blade (it's a useful enough approximation for my purposes).

Martial Arts defines a knife as "any one-handed blade smaller than a sword, built for effective cutting and stabbing." It further defines a long knife as "[the] largest [knife]
— at a total length between 15 and 23 inches... only marginally less substantial than a shortsword."

From this, all I know is:
1) The shortest long knife is only 3 inches shorter than the shortest shortsword.
2) The longest long knife is only 1 inch shorter than the longest shortsword.
3) Effectively equal in average size, the difference between them must lie in mass.

The Melee Weapons Table (Basic Set: Characters p273) lists a shortsword as a Reach 1 weapon (Sw/Cut or Thr/Imp) weighing 2 pounds (Min ST 8). The Melee Weapons Table (Martial Arts p228) lists a long knife as a Reach C/1 weapon (Sw-1/Cut or Thr/Imp) weighing 1.5 pounds (Min ST 7). Assuming those are average weights representing a continuum between the largest and smallest examples of their kind, the difference in mass between long knives and shortswords seems to be half a pound.

Seriously?

(3+1) /2 = 2 inches in length and half a pound in mass? That's all?

Defaulting from Shortsword to Knife, 2 inches and half a pound mean -3 to Skill and -1 to Swing Damage but +C to Reach. Defaulting from Knife to Shortsword, 2 inches and half a pound mean +1 to Swing Damage but -C to Reach and -4 to Skill. Someone
— preferably several someones please explain to me why such an apparently small difference between a "long knife" and a "short sword" makes such a significant difference in GURPS. How would a fighter wielding a 20-inch "long knife" with Knife Skill fight differently from an identical fighter wielding a 20-inch "short sword" with Shortsword Skill?

My mind, it is boggled. <laugh>
__________________

Tim Harris
The Seeker
Time Lord

Saving the universe one planet at a time. Occasionally from my own mistakes. Oops.

Last edited by the_seeker; 12-09-2010 at 10:51 AM. Reason: Subject/Verb Agreement
the_seeker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 10:50 AM   #2
Crakkerjakk
"Gimme 18 minutes . . ."
 
Crakkerjakk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Default Re: Short Swords vs Long Knives

Low Tech adds a further +1 to thrusting damage for the short sword. And I've long held the opinion that weapon defaults are too harsh.

The swing damage is due to lying on a break-point, much like the difference between the .40 S&W and the .45 ACP in GURPS. Thrust, well, short swords (with the gladius as the primary example) are specifically designed to be better at that, IMO. I can't really justify the C for long knives but not for short swords, though. It might be another break-point.
__________________
My bare bones web page

Semper Fi

Last edited by Crakkerjakk; 12-09-2010 at 10:56 AM.
Crakkerjakk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 10:58 AM   #3
the_seeker
.
 
the_seeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC, United States
Default Re: Short Swords vs Long Knives

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crakkerjakk View Post
Low Tech adds a further +1 to thrusting damage for the short sword.
Low-Tech is definitely at the top of my holiday shopping list, but I'm not so sure acquiring it will dispel my confusion. <laugh> I once owned a Cold Steel Trailmaster Bowie Knife, and I was amazed by the length and heft of the thing. I thought of it as a "baby sword" and wondered what it would be when it grew up.
I regret a roomie I trusted proved unworthy of that trust because he stole my knife and used it to pay off a debt. :(
__________________

Tim Harris
The Seeker
Time Lord

Saving the universe one planet at a time. Occasionally from my own mistakes. Oops.
the_seeker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 10:59 AM   #4
Danukian
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: MI
Default Re: Short Swords vs Long Knives

The same problem occurs when you think about the difference between Fast Draw: Knife and Short Sword
Danukian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 11:00 AM   #5
Crakkerjakk
"Gimme 18 minutes . . ."
 
Crakkerjakk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Default Re: Short Swords vs Long Knives

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danukian View Post
The same problem occurs when you think about the difference between Fast Draw: Knife and Short Sword
Well, it is FD(Knife) and FD(Sword) rather than FD(Short Sword).

But still, you're right. I made FD a weapon skill-specific technique in my games. Along with reduced defaults, if you bought your FD(Short Sword) up to Short Sword, that means you can use the same technique at only -2 on a knife.
__________________
My bare bones web page

Semper Fi

Last edited by Crakkerjakk; 12-09-2010 at 11:05 AM.
Crakkerjakk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 11:32 AM   #6
the_seeker
.
 
the_seeker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC, United States
Default Re: Short Swords vs Long Knives

This became an issue for me when I created a knife-fighting style [1]. The trademark of the style is Dual-Weapon Attack (Knife), and stylists always fight with a matched pair of very large knives. Imagine a design halfway between the Bowie Knife of US frontier legend and the famous Gurkha Kukri. Blade length is 12 to 18 inches with 15 inches being standard. That's definitely within the "long knife" parameters, but they seem light at only a pound and a half each. I can find (and have held) real life analogues, and they were much heavier than that (twice or more in some cases).

[1] A completely fictional cinematic style inspired by the Arimite Knife-Fighters from Talislanta, the Gurkhas and US frontier legends. I'm no martial artist, and I suspect the style would be problematic at best in actual combat.
__________________

Tim Harris
The Seeker
Time Lord

Saving the universe one planet at a time. Occasionally from my own mistakes. Oops.
the_seeker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 11:38 AM   #7
Icelander
 
Icelander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Iceland*
Default Re: Short Swords vs Long Knives

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_seeker View Post
This became an issue for me when I created a knife-fighting style [1]. The trademark of the style is Dual-Weapon Attack (Knife), and stylists always fight with a matched pair of very large knives. Imagine a design halfway between the Bowie Knife of US frontier legend and the famous Gurkha Kukri. Blade length is 12 to 18 inches with 15 inches being standard. That's definitely within the "long knife" parameters, but they seem light at only a pound and a half each. I can find (and have held) real life analogues, and they were much heavier than that (twice or more in some cases).

[1] A completely fictional cinematic style inspired by the Arimite Knife-Fighters from Talislanta, the Gurkhas and US frontier legends. I'm no martial artist, and I suspect the style would be problematic at best in actual combat.
Those are Falchions.

The problem with falchions is that they assume that the point is hardly sharpened. Some designs from other cultures, however, while they are balanced for chopping in the same way as the falchion, also have very servicable points.

In my games, I have the falchion option adding +1 to cut damage and subtracting -1* from imp damage.

*Rather than the -2 that the books have it.
__________________
Za uspiekh nashevo beznadiozhnovo diela!
Icelander is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 11:55 AM   #8
Purple Haze
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Default Re: Short Swords vs Long Knives

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_seeker View Post
This became an issue for me when I created a knife-fighting style [1]. The trademark of the style is Dual-Weapon Attack (Knife), and stylists always fight with a matched pair of very large knives. Imagine a design halfway between the Bowie Knife of US frontier legend and the famous Gurkha Kukri. Blade length is 12 to 18 inches with 15 inches being standard. That's definitely within the "long knife" parameters, but they seem light at only a pound and a half each. I can find (and have held) real life analogues, and they were much heavier than that (twice or more in some cases).
A kukri is really a hatchet/small axe in weight and function. It has a heavy powerful chopping attack rather than a slash or thrust.

A bowies knife is all slash and thrust.
Purple Haze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 01:03 PM   #9
Crakkerjakk
"Gimme 18 minutes . . ."
 
Crakkerjakk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Default Re: Short Swords vs Long Knives

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_seeker View Post
This became an issue for me when I created a knife-fighting style [1]. The trademark of the style is Dual-Weapon Attack (Knife), and stylists always fight with a matched pair of very large knives. Imagine a design halfway between the Bowie Knife of US frontier legend and the famous Gurkha Kukri. Blade length is 12 to 18 inches with 15 inches being standard. That's definitely within the "long knife" parameters, but they seem light at only a pound and a half each. I can find (and have held) real life analogues, and they were much heavier than that (twice or more in some cases).

[1] A completely fictional cinematic style inspired by the Arimite Knife-Fighters from Talislanta, the Gurkhas and US frontier legends. I'm no martial artist, and I suspect the style would be problematic at best in actual combat.
FYI, Escrima would be a good base for this. Most of the training is with batons, but originally they were machetes.
__________________
My bare bones web page

Semper Fi
Crakkerjakk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2010, 11:26 AM   #10
Icelander
 
Icelander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Iceland*
Default Re: Short Swords vs Long Knives

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_seeker View Post
Defaulting from Shortsword to Knife, 2 inches and half a pound mean -3 to Skill and -1 to Swing Damage but +C to Reach. Defaulting from Knife to Shortsword, 2 inches and half a pound mean +1 to Swing Damage but -C to Reach and -4 to Skill. Someone[/SIZE][/FONT][/FONT]— preferably several someones [FONT=&quot][FONT=Arial][SIZE=2]— please explain to me why such an apparently small difference between a "long knife" and a "short sword" makes such a significant difference in GURPS. How would a fighter wielding a 20-inch "long knife" with Knife Skill fight differently from an identical fighter wielding a 20-inch "short sword" with Shortsword Skill?
Fortunately, you can use Long Knife with either Knife or Short Sword skill, so the default issue is somewhat ameliorated.

But, yes, weapon defaults are probably too harsh and many of them should probably boil down to familiarities.
__________________
Za uspiekh nashevo beznadiozhnovo diela!
Icelander is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.