|
|
|
#31 |
|
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Here .
|
Quote:
For most realistic users , the damage difference between Thrust Cut and Thrust -1 Imp wouldn't be that much . In a Fantasy or Horror campaign they would be a useful design feature in anti-zombie swords {for when there isn't enough space to swing} if anyone needed a reason for it . If I remember correctly , there is a type of arrow head that is cutting and if one roatated the blade of a narrow bladed axe 90º to be thrust only , wouldn't it still be cutting ? Not saying you're wrong {except to say "Not saying you're wrong" :)} , but it might be realistic enough {in the grainy land of G.U.R.P.S.} and avoid some peoples' confusion on the subject .
__________________
7 out of 10 people like me , I'm not going to change for the other 3 ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Quote:
I'd do away with the blunt ones myself rather than re-name them. Of course, I''d re-name "Honesty" too. :)
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Cutting weapons cannot target the Vitals, while a spade-tipped sword probably should be able to. As for the cutting arrows, those are probably too wide to reach the Vitals (and I don't think it would be overly unrealistic to give them a poor armor divisor).
Personally, I think some sort of impaling/cutting hybrid stat could be appropriate for some designs (like most cutting arrows and spade-tipped blades). Damage would be cutting for purposes of armor and injury, but would be able to target Vitals (possibly with some sort of penalty, like a minimum amount of damage before you get the multiplier).
__________________
Quos deus vult perdere, prius dementat. Latin: Those whom a god wishes to destroy, he first drives mad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Midwest, USA
|
This isn't the first thread on the subject, or the second or third. Kromm has made answers on this before. IIRC, and I may not, he said the blunt ones aren't really historic, but I forget why he said they were included (but he did say).
In addition to curing cancer and bringing back my kitty that died while I was in the fifth grade, I'm sure Low Tech will take care of all this.
__________________
. "How the heck am I supposed to justify that whatever I feel like doing at any particular moment is 'in character' if I can't say 'I'm chaotic evil!'"? —Jeff Freeman |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | ||
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
When I read the rules for a non-thrusting Greatsword I always pictured something like what the Uruk Hai use in LOTR, without the spikes. Even if they were never made in real life, swords like that are common in fantasy settings.
http://www.moviepropshopuk.com/image...%20hai%20x.jpg http://www.ucforums.com/photopost/da...rsword-med.jpg
__________________
<>< |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 | |
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Quote:
__________________
There is no "i" in team, but there is in Dangerious! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| sword, swords, weapons |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|