Throwing the "nothing" you have.

Pordobolito · 08-06-2010, 07:19 PM

I get a monster which i cannot beat. Bad results: CHOOSE either to lose all the cards from your hand OR all your small items.

I had no cards but had many good small items and chose to lose all the cards from my hand (0). Having 0 cards is having something, 0. I mean that it is different than having space/void. To be more specific you have 0 items but 0 and space/void are different concept. I should have no hand in order to lose my items.

On the other hand one told me that since i have no cards i should lose my items.
He compared the situation to the skill of the mage who can lose all his cards to charm the monster. I base my decision to the fact that i have the choice to lose even the 0 that i have.

Thats my approach to this situation. For the record 4/5 agreed with me and i kept my items.

I guess the mage can't drop his 0 cards to charm the monster which comes in contradiction to my previous approach!

08-06-2010, 07:19 PM	#1
Pordobolito Join Date: Jul 2010	Throwing the "nothing" you have. I get a monster which i cannot beat. Bad results: CHOOSE either to lose all the cards from your hand OR all your small items. I had no cards but had many good small items and chose to lose all the cards from my hand (0). Having 0 cards is having something, 0. I mean that it is different than having space/void. To be more specific you have 0 items but 0 and space/void are different concept. I should have no hand in order to lose my items. On the other hand one told me that since i have no cards i should lose my items. He compared the situation to the skill of the mage who can lose all his cards to charm the monster. I base my decision to the fact that i have the choice to lose even the 0 that i have. Thats my approach to this situation. For the record 4/5 agreed with me and i kept my items. I guess the mage can't drop his 0 cards to charm the monster which comes in contradiction to my previous approach!