|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: U.K.
|
In the former case, it has to be a roleplayable open mind - it has to be something that the GM can plausibly penalise you for failing to act on. That's why there's at least a slight sense that it should be disadvantageous; if this is trivially normal behaviour in the setting and there's no incentive for you to ignore the quirk or difficulty in remembering it, taking that quirk is hardly a "contract to roleplay". "Oh yeah, that guy who hangs out with haints and spriggans - bit of a freak, though he seems quite cool when you talk to him."
__________________
-- Phil Masters My Home Page. My Self-Publications: On Warehouse 23 and On DriveThruRPG. |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Eindhoven, the Netherlands
|
Quote:
You have to up those a little too "Really fascinated by clothes and fashion" or "Splutters and stutters when angry" or "curses constantly when angry." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Shore-ish, MA
|
Quote:
"Ahh, the Yankees are an okay team of fellas*" could get you in a fair amount of trouble. *for folks across the pond, please substitute "Arsenal" for "Yankees". :) I think until you're in an Utopian society, where there are no prejudices, Broad-Minded is still a Quirk, worth -1. And I'm betting the adventures there are a bit slow. :) |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Then why is Chauvinistic worth a -1 in society where prejudice still flourishes? How serious does a view on a subject have to be before it's considered a prejudice anyhow?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Shore-ish, MA
|
Quote:
Broad-Minded: You potentially garner a negative reaction because you don't share a particular Chauvinism. Chauvinistic: You potentially garner a negative reaction because you make someone a target of a particular Chauvanism. :) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| broad-minded, broadminded, perks, quirks |
|
|