|
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Quote:
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Quote:
Here's my attempt at a thrown together TL10, nosuperscience fighter: SM+5 (30 tons) Front: [1-2] Armour, Nanocomposite (dDR14), Hardened [3] Defensive ECM [4-5] Fuel Tank - HEDM [6]Weapon, Spinal Mount [Core] Control Room (Pilot) Centre: [1] Armour, Nanocomposite (dDR7), Hardened [2] Defensive ECM [3-6] Fuel Tank - HEDM [Core]Weapon, Spinal Mount: launcher, 24cm, 7 rounds Rear: [1] Armour, Nanocomposite (dDR7), Hardened [2] Weapon, Spinal Mount [3] Defensive ECM [4-5] Fuel Tank - HEDM [6]Reaction Engine, HEDM Rocket She'll do 2Gs, has 4.8 mps DV (which is actually less than 7 minutes fuel). The price is $2.76M, a full load of fuel is $63K, and the missiles are $2.333M for conventional ones. The missiles are large enough that even cruiser (SM+10 or SM+11, IMO) armour should be vulnerable to conventional warheads. More DV can be gained by replacing the spinal launcher with a large one and using the space for fuel tanks giving 7 mps DV (and such a design, were it streamlined, could reach orbit from Earth's surface), maybe a large beam weapon plus power plant and only 6.3 mps fuel, or maybe a second engine for 4G acceleration. Anyway, what we have is a small, high acceleration fighter, with a single large missile system with enough DV for work in orbital space or similar. If more DV is desired acceleration will drop significantly and/or other systems will have to go (and ECM and armour are really the only dispensable systems), or a bigger vessel will be required.
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|