|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2016
|
I'm creating a Swashbuckler who uses Nito Ryu, and so fights with a katana in one hand and a shortsword in the other. He has one level of Extra Attack and the Trademark Moves (Dual-Weapon Attack; Shortsword Swing/Torso, Broadsword Swing/Torso) and (All-Out-Attack; Broadsword Swing/Neck). I did this to make the following turn possible:
Thanks in advance.
__________________
On GITP as thedanster7000 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
|
Quote:
Effectively, it is the same as you describe (all out attack and dual weapon attack), but you came at it a bit backwards. Also, trademark move covers your turn, not your attack. So in this case, you would have a single trademark move that is the entire action that you describe above. You don't need two separate trademark moves (and, in fact, can't use two separate trademark moves in a single round this way). The only exception to that that I know of is if you are under the effects of something like a greater haste spell which actually grants you extra actions/rounds. I hope that this helps! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ottawa, ON, CA
|
Extra attack grants one extra attack action when you select the Attack, All-Out Attack, or Move And Attack maneuvers (Adventurers p.49). That's your maneuver for the turn: how you break it down is up to you. You can trade ONE attack action for a Rapid Strike or Dual-Weapon Attack, and your All-Out Attack choice can be "Double" for a total of three attack actions.
Your trademark move should be: All-Out Attack (Strong? Determined? Pick one) with the following attack actions: -Dual-Weapon Attack (Shortsword Swing/Torso) & Broadsword Swing/Torso -Broadsword Swing/Neck You could alternately use some other combination, like "AoA (Double): DWA (Shortsword Swing/Torso, Broadsword Swing/Torso), Broadsword Swing/Neck, Shortsword Thrust/Vitals".
__________________
M2: Everything is true. GP: Even false things? M2: Even false things are true. GP: How can that be? M2: I don't know man, I didn't do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
|
Wouldn’t all-out-attack mean no defenses next turn? I don’t understand making all-out-attack as part of a trademark move unless you’re a tank fighting mooks that can’t really hurt you. All-our attack fighting an ogre, for example, is a terrible idea. You might die if he punches your skull, let alone hammers away with a club.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: May 2011
|
Yeah, I can’t see why you would rob a Swashbuckler of his active defenses- it’s like one of the two great things about swashbuckling. Maybe AoA(Double) followed by a targeted attack would be better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 100 hurricane swamp
|
Because the OP thought he'd be getting four attacks in one round, thus it might just be worth it if the foe dies without ever being able to strike a blow itself.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|