RPM Energy Accumulation and Dispel Magic - Page 2

Nosforontu · 10-29-2013, 03:19 PM

In another thread (are RPM conditional spells to powerful) a discussion began to develope towards the end of the discussion about the expected energy cost of a dispel magic effect, and rather or not casters especially pc casters are by default pushing their spell effects to add in additional energy to a spell to prevent it from being dispelled by a roughly equally skilled oppossing caster.

This does spark the question of just how many players/gms are prone with the RPM system to always or frequently cast spells that push up against their energy accumulation limits versus casting spells that have a lower energy cost but still achieve the truly desired goals of the spell.

10-29-2013, 03:19 PM	#1
Nosforontu Join Date: Sep 2004	RPM Energy Accumulation and Dispel Magic In another thread (are RPM conditional spells to powerful) a discussion began to develope towards the end of the discussion about the expected energy cost of a dispel magic effect, and rather or not casters especially pc casters are by default pushing their spell effects to add in additional energy to a spell to prevent it from being dispelled by a roughly equally skilled oppossing caster. This does spark the question of just how many players/gms are prone with the RPM system to always or frequently cast spells that push up against their energy accumulation limits versus casting spells that have a lower energy cost but still achieve the truly desired goals of the spell.