Weapons: Dwarven and ‡

[Jovus]

Originally Posted by Asta Kask

Awkward? And then you can nawkward weapons and gawkward weapons. I don't know what they'd do, but you could use them with awkward weapons.

Naturally, these weapons would be designed to section your opponent into little pieces and rearrange the bits depending on how they're being held or used.

It's only with a ?awkward weapon that you could, for example, decide to replace your opponent's abdomen with a piece of cheese, and then lay out his intestines in an unspecified number of precisely equal lengths. (It would take a bit of setup, though.)

[Anthony]

Originally Posted by Asta Kask

Awkward?

I'd probably go with 'slow' for double-dagger weapons. Not sure about unbalanced, the existing usage is fairly realistic.

[Anders]

Originally Posted by Jovus

Naturally, these weapons would be designed to section your opponent into little pieces and rearrange the bits depending on how they're being held or used.

It's only with a ?awkward weapon that you could, for example, decide to replace your opponent's abdomen with a piece of cheese, and then lay out his intestines in an unspecified number of precisely equal lengths. (It would take a bit of setup, though.)

Weapons like nets, that can be used to catch birds, would be aukward. And then there are the aarkvard weapons.--