|
|
|
#101 |
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
|
That was my hope.:)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#102 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bourbon, IN
|
Then you will be pleased with it. I went into the article expecting something different, but enjoyed what I got.
__________________
"There are not many persons who know what wonders are opened to them in the stories and visions of their youth." - HPL |
|
|
|
|
|
#103 | |
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Not in your time zone:D
|
Quote:
Edit: bah, humbug. Using Armor Design, a TL4 DR4 steel breastplate weighs 11.2lbs and costs $15,000? LowTech, it would be 12lb and $1,500. Am I doing something wrong?
__________________
"Sanity is a bourgeois meme." Exegeek PS sorry I'm a Parthian shootist: shiftwork + out of country = not here when you are:/ It's all in the reflexes Last edited by jacobmuller; 02-27-2013 at 04:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 | |
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CA
|
Quote:
In Low-Tech, DR 4 plate armor for the chest would cost $1,125 and weigh 9 lbs (take DR3 Light Plate and use the Heavy Plate rule to add +1 DR). No idea why the massive difference in pricing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#105 | |
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: earth....I think.
|
Quote:
page 17 of Low tech instant armor gives you the listing for using steel. but yeah, the listing price is a little high. I think it should be priced (Steel, Hardened) at around $200. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#106 | |
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CA
|
Naw, it's Steel. It's just not Hardened Steel (the TL4 item in the Armor Design Rules that costs 5x as much as normal Steel).
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
|
Why? You're replacing all the lower quality material in the armor with higher quality material. The price is not a game mechanic balance feature, it's price.
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table A Wiki for my F2F Group A neglected GURPS blog |
|
|
|
|
|
#108 | |
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CA
|
Quote:
If it's always +1 DR only, then it shouldn't be 'replacing the lower-quality material with higher-quality material'; it should be something like 'treating a thin section of the outer-edge of the material, but not impacting the rest of the material'. A straight addition would make more sense with the second type, since the amount of labor wouldn't change based on the amount of DR the thing already has. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#109 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
That's because 'hardened' is actually a surface treatment (it's not all hard steel, it's surface-hardened). Using TL 6+ methods it would be a percentage increase since you can basically make arbitrarily thick layers of hard over soft, but that may not have worked at TL 3, and I have no idea if hardening using low tech methods would be more difficult on thicker sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 |
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: CA
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| low-tech, pyramid 3/52, pyramid issues |
|
|