06-01-2013, 08:59 PM | #31 |
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine
|
Re: Unkillable 3 vs. a Black Hole?
.
someone asked, least i think they were asking. if they can have an affliction to cancel any advantage. and my solution was add the modular ability?, to the afflictions target advantages. as a way to change the given advantage that can be targeted to be cancelled. |
06-01-2013, 09:01 PM | #32 | |
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
|
Re: Unkillable 3 vs. a Black Hole?
Quote:
|
|
06-01-2013, 09:02 PM | #33 |
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
Re: Unkillable 3 vs. a Black Hole?
|
06-01-2013, 09:03 PM | #34 |
Join Date: Mar 2011
|
Re: Unkillable 3 vs. a Black Hole?
To finish off a character with unkillable III its best to do just inflict severe and permanent damage. Like slicing up their brain without quite killing them.
Although I personally would call foul on the maiming trick. Unkillable should also include protection from such crap, such as maiming or most permanent injuries. By the time you get to -5HP or less you've suffered massive and "permanent" damage to just about everything. You die, not because you run out of HP, but because you've suffered massive brain damage. (Indeed that is the def. of death.) Unkillable should be you get back up and are functional again, not that you come back as a vegetable. With that said the more legit ways to kill a unkillable character are affliction (negates unkillable III), or similar tricks. Another option is send them someplace they can't get back from. For example stick them into stasis for a very long time. On a side note, a big enough black hole might dilate time sufficiently to do exactly that. You could also banish them to an alternate dimension that has no means of getting back. Or stick them in a really solid jail. Really it all depends on what is possible in your world. If there is someone tossing sufficiently powerful resurrection magic they can get anyone back. |
06-01-2013, 09:11 PM | #35 | |
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine
|
Re: Unkillable 3 vs. a Black Hole?
Quote:
my thoughts would be. UK3 gone but body still there UK3 kicks back in. when anti psi leaves area or time expires UK3 gone but body has been destroyed the character is dead. as there is nothing to be the anchor for the individual. |
|
06-01-2013, 09:13 PM | #36 | |
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine
|
Re: Unkillable 3 vs. a Black Hole?
Quote:
|
|
06-01-2013, 09:19 PM | #37 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: Unkillable 3 vs. a Black Hole?
Does the character come back to life if the Achilles Heel is removed?
|
06-01-2013, 09:19 PM | #38 | ||
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
Re: Unkillable 3 vs. a Black Hole?
Unkillable 3 normally does.
According to GURPS Powers p. 155 "Lasting effects endure as explained under Unconsciousness [when Neutralized]" and "Unconsciousness never has any effect on passive, transient abilities". By my reading Unkillable is Transient and it's clearly passive. Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by sir_pudding; 06-01-2013 at 09:23 PM. |
||
06-02-2013, 01:10 AM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Unkillable 3 vs. a Black Hole?
|
06-02-2013, 01:17 AM | #40 | |
Computer Scientist
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Re: Unkillable 3 vs. a Black Hole?
Quote:
Negative, neither massive nor massless objects can leave the event horizon of a black hole. The inability of massless objects like light to leave is why they are called black, and the inability of mass to leave is why they are called holes. |
|
Tags |
gm advice, unkillable |
|
|