06-09-2014, 02:10 PM | #101 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Rationalizing a Firefly - Serenity type setting
|
06-09-2014, 02:18 PM | #102 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: a crooked, creaky manse built on a blasted heath
|
Re: Rationalizing a Firefly - Serenity type setting
Quote:
The Alliance presents a bigger threat if there's no place to escape it and start over. |
|
06-09-2014, 02:19 PM | #103 | |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Rationalizing a Firefly - Serenity type setting
Quote:
I can't think of any vaguely realistic problem other than the clichéd grey goo scenario that would make earth truly uninhabitable. It's best to keep it mysterious and unknown by the characters rather than try to explain or lampshade it.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
|
06-09-2014, 02:26 PM | #104 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Rationalizing a Firefly - Serenity type setting
The cold, dryness, wind, thin air, and light/darkness circadian disruptions make the place sound like hell on earth.
My mild S.A.D. would make me homicidal in the summer, and comatose in the winter.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
06-09-2014, 02:30 PM | #105 | |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Rationalizing a Firefly - Serenity type setting
Quote:
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
|
06-09-2014, 02:41 PM | #106 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: a crooked, creaky manse built on a blasted heath
|
Re: Rationalizing a Firefly - Serenity type setting
Quote:
And generation ships? Not known. Given that the show did have suspended animation tech, I'm guessing cold storage sleeper ships are more likely. |
|
06-09-2014, 02:41 PM | #107 | |
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Re: Rationalizing a Firefly - Serenity type setting
Quote:
Ditto for psychic powers, which Firefly eventually tipped over into (after having been coy for a while about whether River was just really hyperaware and smart.) |
|
06-09-2014, 02:43 PM | #108 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: a crooked, creaky manse built on a blasted heath
|
Re: Rationalizing a Firefly - Serenity type setting
Quote:
It's not possible, Flyn. Why can you accept it, but not a miracle star system? |
|
06-09-2014, 03:21 PM | #109 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: Rationalizing a Firefly - Serenity type setting
We don't absolutely know that FTL is impossible. The faint hope remains for a loophole. But the idea of hundreds of earth-sized worlds just sitting around in the habitable zone waiting to be terraformed with a snap of the fingers takes more than a loophole.
|
06-09-2014, 06:29 PM | #110 | |
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Alsea, OR
|
Re: Rationalizing a Firefly - Serenity type setting
Quote:
The lack of FTL (albeit having what looks to be STL Alcubierre-style warp drive) makes the setting constrained in a way different from a significant FTL drive setting would be. Keep in mind: with even a 1PSL Sublight drive, Mars is a matter of around 800 minutes at closest, and 2600 at furthest. 14 to 44 hours. At 10 PSL (0.1C), Mars is 1.5 to to 4.5 hours. 10PSL looks to be about right for Firefly's main drive. Theoretically, we can build a stable mission duration of about 1.5 years (that's about what a nuclear submarine is capable of without any replenishments on low-crewing, from public sources.). Let's assume that's a reasonable non-colonial ship model; we'll call this science range. (Colonial range seems to be about 6 months travel time edge-to-core.)
|
|
Tags |
brainstorming, custom setting, firefly, serenity |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|