02-24-2020, 07:06 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
Mitigator with side effects
John suffers from Paranoia [-10], but is on a monthly injection of anti-psychotic drugs (-70%). However, the medicine makes him drowsy, causing him to suffer from Laziness [-10]. How does this modify the value of the mitigator? I'm thinking that the modification should be twice the value of the disadvantage to the mitigator modifier. So twice times [-10] is -20, modifying the -70% to -50%.
Edit: In this case the two traits are of equal value, but what do I do when they're not of the same value?
__________________
“When you arise in the morning think of what a privilege it is to be alive, to think, to enjoy, to love ...” Marcus Aurelius Last edited by Anders; 02-24-2020 at 07:39 AM. |
02-24-2020, 07:19 AM | #2 | |
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vermont
|
Re: Mitigator with side effects
Quote:
Possibly just Paranoia (-10) and Personality Change (Lazy instead of Paranod when on medication) (-1).
__________________
My ongoing thread of GURPS versions of DC Comics characters. |
|
02-24-2020, 07:39 AM | #3 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
Re: Mitigator with side effects
But what do I do when they're not of the same value. Ideally, the resulting disadvantage should be worth less than the original one.
__________________
“When you arise in the morning think of what a privilege it is to be alive, to think, to enjoy, to love ...” Marcus Aurelius |
02-24-2020, 09:11 AM | #4 |
Join Date: Feb 2014
|
Re: Mitigator with side effects
Ideally, but I could see someone willing to put up with some serious side effects to avoid Sadism:CR6 or another very socially/legally unacceptable disad.
|
02-24-2020, 01:04 PM | #5 |
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
Re: Mitigator with side effects
True. Bruce Banner in many versions would put up with a lot to get rid of his Berserker/Split Personality/Alternate Form combination, for example.
__________________
Warning, I have the Distractible and Imaginative quirks in real life. "The more corrupt a government, the more it legislates." -- Tacitus Five Earths, All in a Row. Updated 12/17/2022: Apocrypha: Bridges out of Time, Part I has been posted. |
02-24-2020, 01:36 PM | #6 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
Re: Mitigator with side effects
So what do you think of my proposed cost?
__________________
“When you arise in the morning think of what a privilege it is to be alive, to think, to enjoy, to love ...” Marcus Aurelius |
02-24-2020, 02:20 PM | #7 |
Join Date: Jun 2013
|
Re: Mitigator with side effects
Instead of putting a Mitigator on the Disadvantage, give the character Negated Disadvantage, with a Limitation to represent it being dependent on the Mitigator. Then go ahead and add Temporary Disadvantage to the Negated Disadvantage. So, Paranoia [-10], Negated Paranoia (Mitigator -30%; Temporary Disadvantage, Laziness -10%) [6]. To clean it up, just rename Temporary Disadvantage to Alternate Disadvantage and reverse the sign - Paranoia (Alternate Disadvantage +10%; Mitigator -70%) [-4]. Note Alternate Disadvantage has to be combined with Mitigator or similar.
Note this is a pretty poor point return considering how much of a disadvantage it is for your Mitigator to just replace one problem with another (rather than eliminating the Disadvantage outright, at least so long as the Mitigator is in play). That's more a function of Temporary Disadvantage being worth so little when it's put onto a low-price trait. As I've suggested before, using an Alternate Abilities-like build for Temporary Disadvantage may give fairer results. In this case, the character has Laziness [-10], Paranoia [-10], Negated Laziness [10], and Negated Paranoia (Mitigator -30%; AA x1/5) [1.4]. That last rounds up to [2], for a net [-8]. This approach is somewhat problematic, however, as it suggests that someone who can freely switch between Laziness and Paranoia would also be at a net [-8].
__________________
GURPS Overhaul |
02-24-2020, 10:29 PM | #8 |
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
Re: Mitigator with side effects
I would always assume that the more expensive disadvantage is the one being mitigated by the other, even if narratively the other way around. For example, if you have Delusions ("The trees are always listening, but never do anything")[-1], and you take a drug which prevents that but causes Chronic Depression [-15], you have the option of mitigating the second by suffering the first.
|
02-24-2020, 10:35 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
|
Re: Mitigator with side effects
Put both of the Disadvantages on the character - Paranoia modified by Mitigator, and Laziness modified by Only While Medicated.
|
02-24-2020, 11:25 PM | #10 | |
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vermont
|
Re: Mitigator with side effects
I think it's problematic. On the medication you have a -10 point disadvantage, off the medication you have a -10 point disadvantage. Your solution ends up as as only -5 points.
The canonical way to handle something similar to this is Split Personality. With Split Personality, you have two sets of disadvantages of equal cost and you get full value for them (plus the value of Split Personality). Quote:
If you set the value of the mitigator at -50% for both, then the cost of having one of 2 different 10 point disadvantages is -10, and the total cost is always the mean of the two disadvantages. So Paranoia with a Laziness Side Effect is -10, but Paranoia with a Shyness side effect is -8, and Paranoia with Chronic Depression is -13. This seems mostly fair. You could justify a Quirk for the reaction penalty from people who notice the change in your personality and a Perk for, essentially, having some control over which disadvantage you have at any given time. But the easiest thing would be for these two costs to cancel out.
__________________
My ongoing thread of GURPS versions of DC Comics characters. |
|
Tags |
alternate rules, mitigator |
|
|