06-26-2014, 07:01 AM | #41 | |
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Re: Low-Tech Democracy.
Quote:
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
|
06-26-2014, 07:02 AM | #42 | |
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Re: Low-Tech Democracy.
Quote:
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
|
06-26-2014, 05:54 PM | #43 | |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Re: Low-Tech Democracy.
Quote:
And the question was not whether it makes democracy more impossible then. There were plenty of Medieval republics and constitutional monarchies. The question was whether it would be something that would look like a modern democracy with liberal values, or would look like-a medieval democracy.
__________________
"The navy could probably win a war without coffee but would prefer not to try"-Samuel Eliot Morrison Last edited by jason taylor; 06-26-2014 at 06:33 PM. |
|
06-26-2014, 06:05 PM | #44 | |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Re: Low-Tech Democracy.
Quote:
So what I am really asking is does the OP mean, "a state that has mores recognizably similar to modern liberal values that has nothing but obvious physical concerns to give a modern westerner discomfort", or "a giant Swiss Confederation." Because if the answer is the later, then yes, nothing prevents it other then administrative ingenuity. If the former he is out of luck; some things just can't be gotten at that TL.
__________________
"The navy could probably win a war without coffee but would prefer not to try"-Samuel Eliot Morrison Last edited by jason taylor; 06-26-2014 at 06:32 PM. |
|
06-26-2014, 09:10 PM | #45 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: a crooked, creaky manse built on a blasted heath
|
Re: Low-Tech Democracy.
Quote:
I don't think extreme social stigma is necessary for gong farmers. They were paid workers in England of the centuries in question, not slaves. But, sure, if the OP wants what you say he wants, it might not make sense below a certain TL. Maybe. But I really don't find your argument about poop collection convincing. We have people now, in this country, who do dangerous and dirty jobs. So do India, Mexico, Brazil, South Korea, etc. Last edited by combatmedic; 06-26-2014 at 09:13 PM. |
|
06-26-2014, 09:19 PM | #46 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
Re: Low-Tech Democracy.
I certainly don't find it unlikely that 'nightmen' (as they were called in Danish -- natmænd) might be disenfranchised in a low-tech democracy. What I don't see is why having a small group of disenfranchised people would make a democracy impossible. Or a fairly large group for that matter.
Hans |
06-27-2014, 09:29 AM | #47 | |
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Re: Low-Tech Democracy.
Quote:
The not particularly liberal concept of rule of law, and it's cousin constitutionalism, functions the same way, and are likewise fundamentally anti-democratic. Any of these can appear independently of the others, and democracy is the least important of the three for creating a government modern westerners could feel comfortable with.
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
|
06-27-2014, 09:55 AM | #48 | |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Re: Low-Tech Democracy.
Quote:
Now that could actually be made a useful plot point, by allowing the PCs to have Pet The Dog moments. And so on. The problem is that to be anything like reality the PCs will be as shocked and possibly as sanctimonious as Cordelia was in Barrayar and if they are written up as natives that will make it hard to roleplay.
__________________
"The navy could probably win a war without coffee but would prefer not to try"-Samuel Eliot Morrison Last edited by jason taylor; 06-27-2014 at 10:32 AM. |
|
06-27-2014, 10:26 AM | #49 |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Re: Low-Tech Democracy.
Or to put it another way, is the OP making a low tech democracy just for the fun of making a con world, or is he trying to make a "good guy" country? If the former it can be arranged; an empire sized state on that model is difficult to believe but one can stretch a point. If the latter, antique and medieval constitutionalist states may have been on the whole better then traditional monarchies but that does not make them nice places either.
__________________
"The navy could probably win a war without coffee but would prefer not to try"-Samuel Eliot Morrison |
06-27-2014, 10:37 AM | #50 |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Re: Low-Tech Democracy.
That is just one example of the problems of environment. Social, economic, and even economic realities define government more often then vice versa. The example just given is just a question of how humanely it would be ruled in practice. Other social realities define whether a democracy can exist at all. There has to be a strong middle class with plenty of money and an easily mastered weapons system that does not require spending so much time practicing at arms that normal work cannot be done. That is you can have a hoplite democracy but not a samurai one.
__________________
"The navy could probably win a war without coffee but would prefer not to try"-Samuel Eliot Morrison |
Tags |
democracy, government, low-tech |
|
|