04-19-2016, 02:58 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Aug 2015
|
Snakes and Size Modifier
The SMs given for snakes on the writeups on p. B458 seem to imply that a snake's SM is 2 less than the SM determined by their length. Is this explicitly stated anywhere in the books?
|
04-19-2016, 04:56 AM | #2 | |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: Snakes and Size Modifier
Quote:
There is a rule (BS550) that if an object is much smaller in 2 of 3 dimensions, which is...pretty accurate for a snake, you use the smallest dimension instead of the largest. But that would make snakes a lot more than -2 SM relative to their length. (That bit also only really makes sense when SM is viewed solely as a modifier to projectile or thrusting attacks. It's really easy to hit a stick with another stick!) Does the SM line up with their mass? (To do SM by mass, not actually recommended: calculate HP/ST by mass per BS558, using half the value for Unliving objects to get the value for a living creature. Then divide that by 5, retaining fractions, and use the resulting number as a linear measurement in yards on the Size and Speed/Range Table.)
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. Last edited by Ulzgoroth; 04-19-2016 at 05:00 AM. |
|
04-19-2016, 07:46 AM | #3 |
Join Date: Aug 2015
|
Re: Snakes and Size Modifier
I always found it a little weird that Basic has rules for increasing effective SM for thick objects (+2 for box/sphere, +1 for elongated box) but nothing for the opposite. -2 for a long thin object feels like a good houserule of thumb.
(Also I've never liked any of the mechanics that try to match hp with mass. I find the system works better when the mechanics based on abstracted characteristics and the ones based on real-world measurements are kept largely separate.) |
04-19-2016, 07:49 AM | #4 |
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
|
Re: Snakes and Size Modifier
When you look at the modifiers for shape, it shows that SM is really more about volume than length/height. Adjusting by -1 or -2 for slimness is entirely appropriate in my opinion.
__________________
All about Size Modifier; Unified Hit Location Table A Wiki for my F2F Group A neglected GURPS blog |
04-19-2016, 08:34 AM | #5 | |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: Snakes and Size Modifier
Quote:
Also, HP needs to be linked to real-world measurements for it to be possible to stat any real thing...
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
04-19-2016, 11:25 AM | #6 | |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: On the road again...
|
Re: Snakes and Size Modifier
Quote:
In the case of snakes, I often think, "what would the snake's SM be if it was curled up for support and only the front 1/3 was 'erect'?" This isn't a hard-and-fast rule with a formula backing it up, though, as it is an eyeballed guideline. YMMV
__________________
"Life ... is an Oreo cookie." - J'onn J'onzz, 1991 "But mom, I don't wanna go back in the dungeon!" The GURPS Marvel Universe Reboot Project A-G, H-R, and S-Z, and its not-a-wiki-really web adaptation. Ranoc, a Muskets-and-Magery Renaissance Fantasy Setting |
|
04-19-2016, 11:28 AM | #7 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Snakes and Size Modifier
Given its mechanical effects, it really should be about area.
|
04-19-2016, 02:44 PM | #8 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Snakes and Size Modifier
Except that would make snakes require more food and water than comparably massed mammals, which is of course silly.
SM is all over the place in Gurps for anything not human shaped.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
04-19-2016, 02:48 PM | #9 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Snakes and Size Modifier
The primary effects of SM are modifiers to attacking and perception. However, a mammalian snake would require more food than a more compact mammal of the same mass.
|
04-19-2016, 05:53 PM | #10 | |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Snakes and Size Modifier
Quote:
Primary effects are for attacks, but that would mean we need SM for each dimension rather than R.A.W.'s longest only.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
|
Tags |
size modifier |
|
|