08-08-2024, 02:35 PM | #11 |
Join Date: Jul 2005
|
Re: Thoughts on a Setting
|
08-09-2024, 08:56 PM | #12 | |||
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pioneer Valley
|
Re: Thoughts on a Setting
Quote:
Quote:
The second is the aforementioned "far fewer mages." You might get that single Plant Growth-25 mage in a kingdom. And you might not. You sure as hell won't see twenty mages running spells up to -25 without a RuneQuest-esque level of mage density in the first place, and their services will have a very minimal impact on the setting. One of the hoariest fallacies this forum dives into on a regular basis is conflating "technically possible" into "ubiquitous." Quote:
__________________
My gaming blog: Apotheosis of the Invisible City "Call me old-fashioned, but after you're dead, I don't think you should be entitled to a Dodge any more." - my wife It's not that I don't understand what you're saying. It's that I disagree with what you're saying. |
|||
08-11-2024, 01:01 AM | #13 |
Join Date: Jul 2005
|
Re: Thoughts on a Setting
Slow and Sure is possible, and if you have assistants and Powerstones enough, Q&D is also possible.
|
Tags |
magic, setting building, variant rules |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|