06-11-2023, 09:56 PM | #21 | |
☣
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southeast NC
|
Re: [Astronomy help] Likelihood of discovery?
Quote:
There have been proposed missions for asteroid detection systems (which would be ideally equipped to detect spacecraft, as well) in exotic orbits. It's easiest to spot asteroids with your back to the sun, so the Sentinel mission was planned to be placed at Sun-Venus L3. If it hadn't been cancelled, there wouldn't be many places in the solar system that you could reliably hide. At TL 9, the only thing preventing a Sun-Venus L4/5 asteroid binoculars is political will to pay for it. On the other hand, politicians spending money to avoid a planetary scale extinction is probably less believable than an invisibility cloak.
__________________
RyanW - Actually one normal sized guy in three tiny trenchcoats. |
|
06-11-2023, 10:52 PM | #22 |
Evil Game Master For Hire
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
Re: [Astronomy help] Likelihood of discovery?
As soon as your ship starts powering up its systems -- presuming it was mostly powered down for most of its trip here in the first place -- then your ship is going to be a very noticeable source of heat that infrared sensors will immediately pick up. The difficulty of hiding a powered device in near absolute zero space is quite difficult (read "darned near impossible, barring magic-tech that can violate the laws of thermodynamics"). This unfortunate side effect of real-world physics has been the source of more than one online discussion in some of the other newsgroups I've read.
Franklin
__________________
Franklin W. Cain Evil Game Master For Hire -- Have Dice, Will Travel SJG MIB # 9808; Net.Rep.: Chez G* and Frag |
06-11-2023, 10:59 PM | #23 | |
Evil Game Master For Hire
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
Re: [Astronomy help] Likelihood of discovery?
Quote:
__________________
Franklin W. Cain Evil Game Master For Hire -- Have Dice, Will Travel SJG MIB # 9808; Net.Rep.: Chez G* and Frag |
|
06-11-2023, 11:48 PM | #24 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
|
Re: [Astronomy help] Likelihood of discovery?
However, if you're in the outer system, and know that all the sensors looking for you will be in the inner system, you can pump the heat to radiators that face way from the inner system. You'll be nice and cold in one direction, and very warm in the other. Too bad if you were wrong about the direction the sensors would be...
__________________
Rupert Boleyn "A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history." |
06-12-2023, 12:11 AM | #25 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pioneer Valley
|
Re: [Astronomy help] Likelihood of discovery?
A couple of thoughts.
First off, a major factor in the ship's ability to go stealth mode is this: (a) why would they want to?, (b) what reason do they have for thinking that there's a technological civilization based on Earth, which (c) they would perceive as being a threat to them? Secondly, obviously -- as other posters have already established -- the technology to detect an object that size at that distance was present on Earth in late TL 6, never mind 9. It's not whether, but how quickly. Think of present-day minor planetoid discoveries, where Michael Brown and his team has been the great stars of the 21st century. He's found asteroids smaller than this ship in the asteroid belt, and while sometimes it's taken the public beyond the IAU a while to give a damn, sooner or later it pays attention. Now what happens, with tech a TL more advanced than ours, when a large object like that all of a sudden appears within the orbit of Saturn. Just like that. When damn near every object larger than a click within Neptune's orbit has been bagged, tagged and catalogued. Brown's grandchildren would find that sucker within days, it'd be confirmed within hours, the Solar Republic's Grand Council would be in emergency session a half day later, such space fleet as they had would be on high alert fifteen minutes later, and the boffins would be planning the probe.
__________________
My gaming blog: Apotheosis of the Invisible City "Call me old-fashioned, but after you're dead, I don't think you should be entitled to a Dodge any more." - my wife It's not that I don't understand what you're saying. It's that I disagree with what you're saying. Last edited by RGTraynor; 06-12-2023 at 12:15 AM. |
06-12-2023, 12:36 AM | #26 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: [Astronomy help] Likelihood of discovery?
We aren't using them for broad area surveys, though. We managed magnitude 19 surveys in the 90s, going beyond that leads us to things like Pan-STARRS (2010) and LSST (expected online 2024).
|
06-12-2023, 12:42 AM | #27 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: [Astronomy help] Likelihood of discovery?
A very hot asteroid. Given the parameters of this object what will give it away is the infra-red it will radiate unless it puts a large object between it and the infra-red telescopes a TL9 future civilization will have in space. It takes some pretty extreme super science to cancel out that.
|
06-12-2023, 05:09 AM | #28 | |
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Brazil
|
Re: [Astronomy help] Likelihood of discovery?
Quote:
What I mean is that, for that kind of "alarm system" we would need a sort of "satellite constelation" around our solar system of a kind similar to the satellite constellation that we have around Earth, and such endeavor would only be feasible for a TL10+ civilization |
|
06-12-2023, 05:27 AM | #29 | |
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Brazil
|
Re: [Astronomy help] Likelihood of discovery?
Quote:
Now, as to why would them give a damn, it could for example be a "Prime Directive" for instance. I hardly believe a TL11 civ would ever feel threatened by a TL 9 one. That would be like a nuclear submarine commander feeling threatened by a steam warship that doesnt have a sonar. It's absolutely nonsensical. But a Prime Directive sort of thing could be possible. And as to why they would "know" that there's a TL 9 civ here, first they would know due to our radio transmissions and secondly even if they didnt know, this could just be a basic procedure when jumping into solar systems that hold planets on the... Sorry, I forgot the term in English, but planets in the line of orbit that allows for liquid water. So, common procedure, always hide from such kinds of worlds. That could be one explanation. Most likely thou, those guys would probably not care, seeing the civilization bellow as "just a bunch of medieval barbarians". |
|
06-12-2023, 05:56 AM | #30 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Re: [Astronomy help] Likelihood of discovery?
Does the FTL in your setting have any kind of signal upon exiting hyperspace? Could the local civilization detect it?
"Not moving", has the ship established an orbit around the local star or some planetary body, or is it in a free fall towards the local star, or is it on a hyperbolic trajectory that will take it out of the local star system? Or does it magic... ultra technically stay in place compared to the local star, and the other local bodies just approach it and then start moving away from it. Even if the ultra tech drive has no signature, the latter one would be a pretty big discovery quite soon after a technical malfunction has been ruled out from any small body tracking telescopes. Unless it has no signature, at which point it depends if it happens to block any star under a longer observation. Imagine that popping into our system and blocking Betelgeuse or some other often tracked star... Unless it's truly invisible, meaning that one can see through it, in which case we wouldn't be able to detect it at all.
__________________
[/delurk] AotA is of course IMHO, YMMV. vincit qui se vincit |
Tags |
astronomy, campaign design, sensors |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|