Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-19-2019, 09:20 PM   #1
PTTG
 
PTTG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Default Campaigns built around Protecting an NPC?

I'm curious what sort of player response you've gotten from campaigns built around protecting one specific NPC -- and a weak one at that.

Perhaps the prototype for this sort of campaign might be the first half of most Harry Potter books, seen from the perspective of his teachers. The PCs have responsibilities and adventures outside of the NPC, but things tend to revolve around it, and it might make trouble.

This partywide Dependent (or small group of Dependents, I suppose,) probably should be played with a careful hand, in order to avoid making them annoyingly weak or passive -- or, for that matter, too powerful or proactive.

Has it worked out? Was the story able to work interestingly? Did the players enjoy the structure? Any thoughts going into it?
PTTG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2019, 12:31 AM   #2
dcarson
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Default Re: Campaigns built around Protecting an NPC?

I ran a convention game once where the party was hired by a dragon with a injured wing to smuggle him back to the mountains. The couple of groups that played seem to enjoy it.
dcarson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2019, 02:42 AM   #3
Michele
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Udine, Italy
Default Re: Campaigns built around Protecting an NPC?

I've run a multi-session adventure set in Paris in the 1930s with secret supernatural, and the PCs essentially served as bodyguards. There were parts in which the PCs were a bit bored, because that's part and parcel of that job; but those were the parts in which the players could spend time in non-combat roleplaying, so the players (as opposed to the characters) weren't bored.

Then, of course they also gathered intel, and eventually opted for the obvious the-best-defense-is-the-offense strategy.

The main NPC wasn't weak per se, he was rich and powerful; but he was out of his depth in the kind of threat he had stumbled in. That's what was annoying in him. A member of his family didn't understand the danger and tried to sneak away on her own - which was annoying too, but also typical of bodyguard work, I believe.
__________________
Michele Armellini
GURPS Locations: St. George's Cathedral
Michele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2019, 03:12 AM   #4
johndallman
Night Watchman
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cambridge, UK
Default Re: Campaigns built around Protecting an NPC?

I recently played a two-session fantasy scenario built around taking a mute four-year-old back to her home village. Fortunately, she was pretty sensible and didn't make much trouble for us, but protecting her definitely made life complicated.
johndallman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2019, 03:33 AM   #5
Mysterious Dark Lord v3.2
 
Mysterious Dark Lord v3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The deep dark haunted woods
Default Re: Campaigns built around Protecting an NPC?

Long long ago ... A Supers campaign. We were protecting a philanthropist from asaassins. There were several plots thwarted and intrigues entangled. When we caught the adversaries, though, we ended up being shot in the back of the heads. It turned out our "philanthropist" used his charities as a cover for accumulating human sacrifices and our "assassins" were the Good Guys. After we managed to win, we had a "A-Team" arc, eunning from the law for killing a well-known philanthropist.

Remember the twist ending.
__________________
"When you talk about damage radius, even atomic weapons pale before that of an unfettered idiot in a position of power."
- Sam Starfall from the webcomic Freefall
Mysterious Dark Lord v3.2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2019, 04:26 AM   #6
coronatiger
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Default Re: Campaigns built around Protecting an NPC?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Campaign handout exerpt
Something is rotten in the Northern Province...

It has been a bad year for the people of the north. When last year’s crops failed and livestock fell sick and died, everyone seemed to think that it was only natural that some years would be worse than others. The nobility instructed merchants to import food from the south, and as the price of food grew, the church preached solidarity and generocity. Of course, there were those who ignored the church and sought to profiteer in various ways, but in general, people accepted that times were hardandhoped for a better yield from farms and fields next year. Then, the Incidents started happening.

Nobody knows what the first Incident was. Maybe it was the farmer who hanged himselfin the woods. Maybe it was the boy who broke his neck tripping over a fallen branch. Or maybe it was the hunter who was raving mad when she returned. When countless stories of such events reached the nobles’ ears, they told village mayors and other local authorities to make a record of these tragic incidents, and to forward reports to Gioling, the province capital. The people took heart, confident that the nobles would find a solution.

Time passed, and no solution presented itself. Most Incidents would, in better times, be written off as bad luck or tragic accidents, but with the sheer amount happening in so few months, rumors of an unseen evil started spreading.

When the first outlying village burned, someone claimed to have seen orcs in the vicinity. A platoon of soldiers was sent to investigate. They were never heard from again. Garrisons from Gioling were relocated to distant villages, in the hope that they could detect and prevent an orcish incursion. Merchants doubled the guards on their caravans. More villages burned, and the soldiers were always too late to engage the attackers. While the general populace seemed to agree that the attackers were orcs, no actual evidence was ever found to support this theory.

Farmers and villagers started moving towards Gioling, first as a trickle, then as a flow. As Gioling filled up, the number of Incidents there increased. As past turns to present, this is the situation where the players find themselves.
In this campaign, the players had to figure out what was happening to the Northern Province, and to find a way to deal with it. The first story arc revolved around saving two young princesses from the madness of the Incidents and bringing them safely through the wilderness to the South where they could beseech the King for aid. Both princesses were thankful for the PCs' help and protection, but they had widely differing personalities and wishes as to how things should proceed, which made for great role play as the players had to decide which of them (if either) should be allowed to command in a given situation.
__________________
You don't need to spend 100 CP on Status 5 [25] and Multimillionaire [75] to feel like a princess, when Delusion [-10] will do. Or, you can run so far away that Status and Wealth don't apply anymore...

Character sheet: Google Drive link (See this thread for details.)

Campaign logs: Chaotic Pioneering / Confessions of a Forked Tongue / A Doe Among Wolves
coronatiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2019, 05:25 AM   #7
Agemegos
 
Agemegos's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
Default Re: Campaigns built around Protecting an NPC?

I ran a fantasy campaign once in which the PCs were the tutor, the music-teacher, the valet, and the coach of a thirteen-year-old exiled king, who had rescued him from the conquest/sack in which his father was killed. They had to bring him up while wandering the archipelago and keep the real option open of returning one day to drive out the conquerors and reclaim his throne.

That was in my fantasy setting Gehennum, in the Archaic Period, in which the archipelago was divide among hundreds of city-states, with a handful of significant leagues and empires, and a lot of Homeric and dark ages Greek tropes in play.
__________________

Decay is inherent in all composite things.
Nod head. Get treat.

Last edited by Agemegos; 06-20-2019 at 05:30 AM.
Agemegos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2019, 07:51 PM   #8
(E)
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: New Zealand.
Default Re: Campaigns built around Protecting an NPC?

I have run a long and successful game of thrones that centered around a group hired/recruited as bodyguards for the third in line for the throne. The campaign was set a couple of centuries before the main series of books.

The party was assembled as purely bodyguards for the bookish prince, but once the party had earned the prince's trust they discovered his secret. The prince contrary to his carefully crafted image was a truly remarkable and dedicated swordsman, better than the PCs. The party's goal was changed they now had to protect the prince's secret and help him train.

Towards the end of the campaign the PCs got the pay off for all their work. The big bad supernasty plateclad valerian sword weilding champion of the church challenged the prince to a duel.
The party got to sit on the sideline and watch as the prince they had protected and helped train took his opponent apart.

(Fight starts, acting based feint to pretend to unable to draw an overly bejewelled sword, fast draw, stop hit to the eye...)
__________________
Waiting for inspiration to strike......
And spending too much time thinking about farming for RPGs
Contributor to Citadel at Nordvörn
(E) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2019, 07:07 AM   #9
Anaraxes
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Default Re: Campaigns built around Protecting an NPC?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michele View Post
There were parts in which the PCs were a bit bored, because that's part and parcel of that job; but those were the parts in which the players could spend time in non-combat roleplaying, so the players (as opposed to the characters) weren't bored.
You've invented the bottle episode! Now you can spend the production budget you saved on that adventure for fancy locations or flashy special effects in the next adventure.

(Yes, there are narrative reasons relating to pacing and buildup for having such pauses.)
Anaraxes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2019, 10:11 AM   #10
Gold & Appel Inc
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: One Mile Up
Default Re: Campaigns built around Protecting an NPC?

I've pitched a kinda-sorta similar idea with one key difference to two groups, but it never got off the ground for life reasons the time I was taken up on it, so I don't have any real experience to report (yet). That said, the key difference is that the NPC the PCs have to babysit is powerful, physically and socially, and most of their job is to protect him from himself. It's basically an Action! campaign set in a Supers world, with the party desperately trying to keep a vain, tempermental, hard-partying corporate spokeshero safe, happy, and free of bad press.

If I ran it now, I would just use the templates from Action! for the PCs; IIRC the ones I almost ran it with were a Facewoman (The corporate lawyer / PR rep), a Wheelman (Chauffeur / Pilot), a Fast Guy (Physical Security Chief / Crowd Control), a Wire Rat (Electronic Security Chief / Secondary Archivist), and a very patient and dedicated Medic. Their ward, Captain Coke, is not indestructible, but you wouldn't know it from the way he acts. He may be named for the kind of coke that comes in a can, but a lot of his behavior traces directly back to the self-administration of the kind that comes in a small plastic baggie, taken to the logical conclusion of doses that would kill a hippopotamus.
Gold & Appel Inc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
campaign design, roleplaying

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.