12-30-2018, 12:42 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pacheco, California
|
Ignore engagement
A figure not in HTH combat can declare that he is ignoring engagement at the start of his movement and move freely.
Before each hex of that figure's movement any hostile figure can take their action for that round as a melee or ranged attack at that point during movement against the free mover. They treat the mover's front hexes as side hexes and his side hexes as rear hexes for this attack. (Note that the mover's shield (if any) has no effect.) Note that a free mover would still get his pole weapon charge before his target could reply with a shorter weapon, but other hostiles along the way could have struck the free mover before he made that final step up.
__________________
-HJC |
12-30-2018, 03:08 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Re: Ignore engagement
This changes the game into something unrecognizable. Characters can move by others and combat becomes part of movement. There are a lot of wargames that use this mechanic and it can be a fun game but it breaks the flow. Especially if you keep the pole weapons first rule
__________________
Helborn |
12-30-2018, 04:34 PM | #3 |
Join Date: Dec 2017
|
Re: Ignore engagement
I think TFT without engagement (or modified along the lines you suggest) is a really interesting idea, and results in something more realistic (or at least with more 'versimilitude'), particularly when combined with a wider variation of ranges for melee weapons. The result is something obviously very different from core TFT, but definitely worth exploring with some play testing
|
12-31-2018, 12:50 AM | #4 |
Join Date: May 2015
|
Re: Ignore engagement
GURPS does a really good job of combat without engagement, which I prefer, but it is a different game, and works because figures move about 1/2 what they do in TFT, it costs more to turn, most attacks only let you move 1 hex, the movement and action is done together and without having an entire side get to move all their figures at once, etc.
I think there is a need for a house rule to ignore engagement when otherwise it means people are rooted in place when they convincingly would/should not be standing there. The details of this suggestion are interesting but not quite what I'd choose - I don't much care for the facing transformation and useless shields. |
12-31-2018, 03:59 AM | #5 | |
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: London Uk, but originally from Scotland
|
Re: Ignore engagement
Quote:
|
|
12-31-2018, 12:46 PM | #7 | |
Join Date: May 2015
|
Re: Ignore engagement
Quote:
i.e. I have used a few versions of this, usually based on my long-memorized knowledge of how it works in GURPS, where I note the facing as the ignoring figure moves, and apply that facing modifier. Last time I took the time to describe that system on these forums, though, it wasn't well received by people who didn't know/like GURPS, which is understandable. IME, the main issue I have had in play with house rules for ignoring engagement, is not accidentally creating a tactic where people can use it to do run-around attacks too easily. Giving the ignored person a reaction move/shift can help. |
|
12-31-2018, 12:54 PM | #8 | |
Join Date: May 2015
|
Re: Ignore engagement
Quote:
* Fliers stopping flight in mid-air due to engagement. * Panicked runaway horse or bull running full speed somehow stopped because engaged by two people. * You can't flee the impending troll army (or step away from a rolling boulder or lava or whatever) because a hobgoblin is threatening you with a stick. * You are in very heavy armor and have to stay next to opponents who you're sure are very unlikely to hurt you if they hit you. (The rules actually call this out in the "knight in armor is not engaged by a teenage girl" line, but it's not defined where the line is. Also it seems clear in an RPG that a person could keep moving, but there would be consequences - well what are the consequences?) * You're sure it's an image you're facing, and try pretending it isn't there are walk forward. * You're a 7-hex dragon with three hobgoblins or wolves or something engaging you somehow making it impossible for you to move except to push into them one hex. |
|
12-31-2018, 01:00 PM | #9 | |
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: London Uk, but originally from Scotland
|
Re: Ignore engagement
Quote:
|
|
12-31-2018, 01:07 PM | #10 | |
Join Date: May 2015
|
Re: Ignore engagement
Quote:
Most people who do it have agreed it makes sense that ignoring engagement should allow the ignored person a chance to attack the ignorer, but the details of how people handle it have varied, e.g.: * a max-damage auto-hit * an auto-hit * a free attack at some advantage * a free attack with no advantage * a chance to use their normal attack out of sequence at some advantage * a chance to use their normal attack out of sequence * and/or an extra Shift (or full move) to react to the ignorer's movement I tend to agree with hcobb in general that I tend to give: * a chance to use their normal attack out of sequence at some advantage (+2 DX but not necessarily no shield protection) and an extra Shift (or full move) to react to the ignorer's movement. |
|
|
|