|
View Poll Results: Which talents do you routinely let wizards learn at normal cost? | |||
Area Knowledge | 2 | 25.00% | |
Carousing | 1 | 12.50% | |
Charisma | 2 | 25.00% | |
Courtly Graces | 2 | 25.00% | |
Detect Lies | 2 | 25.00% | |
Diplomacy | 2 | 25.00% | |
Horsemanship & Expert Horsemanship | 0 | 0% | |
Naturalist & Expert Naturalist | 2 | 25.00% | |
Priest & Theologian | 3 | 37.50% | |
Physicker & Master Physicker | 2 | 25.00% | |
Scholar | 5 | 62.50% | |
Sex Appeal | 1 | 12.50% | |
Writing | 3 | 37.50% | |
No talents not already identified in ITL | 1 | 12.50% | |
All talents | 1 | 12.50% | |
Other (please explain in your reply) | 1 | 12.50% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-09-2020, 09:19 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New England
|
Talents You Let Wizards Learn at Normal Cost
For game balance, TFT requires wizards to pay more for most talents than heroes do. This can be a disincentive for building characters who are similar to some of the wizard types we might be familiar with from fiction, such as the scholar-wizard. Which talents do you routinely let wizards learn at normal cost instead of double? Check all that apply.
Area Knowledge Carousing Charisma Courtly Graces Detect Lies Diplomacy Horsemanship & Expert Horsemanship Naturalist & Expert Naturalist Priest & Theologian Physicker & Master Physicker Scholar Sex Appeal Writing None All Other (please explain in your reply) |
Tags |
fiction, stereotypes, talents, wizards |
|
|