05-18-2014, 07:55 PM | #61 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: [Space] Panspermia and the Campgaign
Quote:
Bill Stoddard |
|
05-19-2014, 11:48 PM | #62 |
Join Date: Mar 2013
|
Re: [Space] Panspermia and the Campgaign
Is 3.7 billion years too you for this system? I think I can up the age with out too many consequences, from so playing around it looks like the biggest one is that I'll have to switch two planets orbit to keep a planet habitable (It will likely be outside to habitable zone, with the change, but the planet two orbits in will now enter the habitable zone)
|
05-20-2014, 02:48 AM | #63 | |
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Ellicott City, MD
|
Re: [Space] Panspermia and the Campgaign
Quote:
|
|
05-20-2014, 03:55 AM | #64 |
Join Date: Mar 2013
|
Re: [Space] Panspermia and the Campgaign
Panspermia does solve a few problems, even if it does raise some questions in it's wake, but it will also require more time
|
05-20-2014, 02:38 PM | #65 |
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Ellicott City, MD
|
Re: [Space] Panspermia and the Campgaign
This week's Cosmos actually gives you a viable means of panspermia, which requires zero handwaiving on your part.
|
05-20-2014, 03:57 PM | #66 |
Join Date: Mar 2008
|
Re: [Space] Panspermia and the Campgaign
Spectroscopic examination of the atmosphere might spot mining and smelting sooner than you see agriculture.
|
Tags |
evolution, space, system generation |
|
|