06-06-2012, 06:43 PM | #11 | |
Join Date: May 2012
|
Re: Rules question: Targeting inside a car
Quote:
BTW, the term 'near miss' makes very little logical sense. A 'near miss' is a hit, a 'near hit' is a miss... Sorry but my George Carlin lessons are kicking in! |
|
06-06-2012, 07:46 PM | #12 | ||
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Endor
|
Re: Rules question: Targeting inside a car
Quote:
Quote:
(But of course, "close" only counts with certain burst effect weapons…) |
||
06-22-2012, 07:02 AM | #13 |
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: UK
|
Re: Rules question: Targeting inside a car
|
06-22-2012, 07:14 AM | #14 | |
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Harrisonburg VA
|
Re: Rules question: Targeting inside a car
Quote:
(Pedestrians inside the car are considered vehicular components are are immune to burst effect damage.) |
|
06-22-2012, 10:45 AM | #15 |
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
Re: Rules question: Targeting inside a car
To be pedantic pedestrians are not vehicular components.
In the dueltrack C&C rules they took hits from burst weapons that penetrated the to the crew compartment. A pedestrian in riding in the cargo section of a pickup or in an open top vehicle under that ruling would be no more vulnerable than one in the body of a car (or indeed passenger who dropped a grenade under thri seat. In conventional CW cars that had even a single point of armour (even if it has been breached) they are UNEXPOSED and burst effects only affect exposed pedestrians. The net effect is the same though. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|