![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
![]()
I would also like different spin gravities' option for huge stations.
They're big enough to have layers of differing gravities from spin without needing spin tethers. How does gravity change while moving inward, and what points should be traversed quickly to avoid motion sickness. You convinced me. I now want such a supplement. :)
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
![]()
Gravity will be linear in distance to the hub, so if it's 1G at the edges, it will be 0.5G halfway to the hub. Motion sickness probably won't vary, as its more a function of rotations per minute than absolute velocity.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
![]()
I guess we just had to spin it the right way to catch your interest. :)
That said, the Spaceships series is good for roughing out designs; it's not so good when you want to get into the weeds (e.g., different kinds of spin gravity; the benefits that magsails have over lightsails; fine-tuned tonnages; and so on.) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 | |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
![]() Quote:
Then again, I guess that kind of thing is entirely dependent on the shape of the vessel. Geometry was always my weakest subject, so useful shapes for differing purposes would be nice.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Florida
|
![]()
Spin Gravity could be handled with a similar table that Spaceships handles PF for Solar/Cosmic radiation, then a multiplier based on the type of spin gravity used (Booms vs. Cylinders, etc.). In fact, it could correlate with that exact table, having to choose a tradeoff between PF and effective Gs.
One of the reasons why I would like to see a Magnetosphere option for Forcescreens. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 | |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
![]()
Or vice versa. I would be perfectly fine with VDS pointing to the Spaceships series for most matters involving operations in space, and while I certainly would not insist on VDS being shackled to decisions made in Spaceships for simplicity's sake, it would be nice if there is enough similarity between the two that spaceships and vehicles designed with the respective systems could be used in the same campaign without any blatant conflicts.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
antimatter, hard sf, spaceships |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|