01-19-2022, 04:08 AM | #21 |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Rome, Italy
|
Re: Bio-Tech vs. Cybernetics
To me it's like apples and oranges: the differences are down to setting preferences...
The two books are not meant to be like items in a menu to pick and mix; they are resource for different game styles. In a "typical" Cyberpunk 2077 campaign cybernetics are widespread while Bio-engineering is for the ultra wealthy or the ultra weirds. On the other hand in the XCOM campaign I am planning Biotech is basically the bread and butter of alien tech, cybernetics are almost unknown of. it's like comparing standard magic with paths one: they are different ways to stat something that have similar results.
__________________
“A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess?” |
01-19-2022, 10:22 AM | #22 | |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: Bio-Tech vs. Cybernetics
Quote:
|
|
01-20-2022, 10:59 AM | #23 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: Bio-Tech vs. Cybernetics
I've gone through them a couple of times now and they actually seem pretty well balanced. It was just a bit of an error that they used "boosted heart" to describe two such mechanically different augmentations.
|
|
|