04-29-2017, 12:35 PM | #31 | |
Join Date: Nov 2012
|
Re: [Basic] Realistic Low Tech Challengers
Quote:
Here's an interesting thought, however; Neanderthal males were highly asymmetrical in their upper bodies, with up to 50% asymmetry between right (bigger) and left (smaller) sides. Modern humans are typically 4-13% asymmetrical. (I am one of the 'most right-handed people' my physio has ever met, according to her; and I barely tip the scales at 9% asymmetry.) It's theorized that this could be a muscle specialization--left hand for delicate tasks, right hand for brute strength tasks--but the simpler explanation to my mind is the theory that it is an artifact of constant use of the one-handed scrapers that are the iconic Neanderthal tool find. Female Neanderthals also show signs of right-handed asymmetry; but the small sample sizes for females makes it difficult to be certain if this is reflective or an accident of sampling. This asymmetry would suggest that they scraped right-handedly, and used swinging weapons right-handedly, but used thrusting weapons left-handedly. The asymmetry would suggest that they get a base ST 11, but add several levels of (3pt) Arm Strength (right side only). The lack of symmetry would also suggest that they would not get the Off Hand Weapon Training perk or skill, as it suggests being equally proficient with both hands, which would be clearly inaccurate, given that high a level of asymmetry. Oh, and the fact that their right-handedness is even more prevalent than in humans suggest that they were a highly co-operative society. I do not understand the rationale behind the one-weapon rule; it seems irrational. A hunter would carry a scraping tool, a knife, and some type of bush tool (a hand axe, for instance). Once you've killed the animal, you have to bleed it, then butcher it. Even if you don't use fire, you'll still need to clear brush for a shelter. |
|
04-29-2017, 12:36 PM | #32 | |
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Pisa, Tuscany, Italy
|
Re: [Basic] Realistic Low Tech Challengers
Quote:
|
|
04-29-2017, 01:08 PM | #33 | |
Hero of Democracy
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: far from the ocean
|
Re: [Basic] Realistic Low Tech Challengers
Quote:
__________________
Be helpful, not pedantic Worlds Beyond Earth -- my blog Check out the PbP forum! If you don't see a game you'd like, ask me about making one! |
|
04-29-2017, 04:35 PM | #34 |
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
Re: [Basic] Realistic Low Tech Challengers
Basically unbalanced cr weapons and all pi weapons are (1), balanced cr, unbalaced cut, and all imp weapons are (1/2), and balanced cut are (1/3).
|
04-29-2017, 05:15 PM | #35 | |
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
Re: [Basic] Realistic Low Tech Challengers
Quote:
I will probably post a full house rule write-up soon. Last edited by phayman53; 04-29-2017 at 07:55 PM. Reason: Clarification |
|
04-29-2017, 10:16 PM | #36 |
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
Re: [Basic] Realistic Low Tech Challengers
Shouldn't the Legionnaire have Thrown Weapon (Spear)-13 listed in skills for the pilum? I see the pilum was written up in the brief table of the weapons/skills/damage and the equipment.
|
04-30-2017, 12:18 PM | #37 |
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Pisa, Tuscany, Italy
|
Re: [Basic] Realistic Low Tech Challengers
I'll try a mediated version of this: armor divisor (0.66) [+50% DR] for balanced cr weapons, unbalanced cut weapons, imp weapons and slings with lead bullets, armor divisor (0.5) for balanced cut weapons and slings with stone or terracotta bullets.
Last edited by Rasna; 04-30-2017 at 05:51 PM. |
04-30-2017, 03:37 PM | #38 |
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
Re: [Basic] Realistic Low Tech Challengers
The problem with this is that you are still getting one handed swords from a ST 10 guy able to cut through light mail and medium gamberson 1/6 times, which just doesn't seem realistic. You also get a ST11 guy thrusting through the same armor on average with the same weapon (unless you round the (.66) up, then it is 1/3 of the time). Light mail voiders and medium gamberson performs better than this in testing, even the cheaply built modern stuff.
|
04-30-2017, 03:46 PM | #39 |
Join Date: May 2007
|
Suggestion -- generic medieval mercenary
Perhaps a variation on the man at arms -- but IIRC in the late medieval era lots of troops, horse & foot, were mercs.
Also the guards of many a castle (and presumably PCs will be venturing into castles at times) were mercenaries. |
04-30-2017, 05:28 PM | #40 | |
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Pisa, Tuscany, Italy
|
Re: [Basic] Realistic Low Tech Challengers
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
low-tech, opponents |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|