|
07-31-2024, 09:08 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
Lifting ST (only for 'advantage')
Lifting ST but only for the purpose of determing how much you can carry with you for one advantage (Insubstantiality, Invisibility, Warp, etc.). My instinct is that this is a leveled perk. Any other ideas?
__________________
“When you arise in the morning think of what a privilege it is to be alive, to think, to enjoy, to love ...” Marcus Aurelius Author of Winged Folk. The GURPS Discord. Drop by and say hi! |
07-31-2024, 09:23 AM | #2 |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Lifting ST (only for 'advantage')
It seems that it ought to be treated as an Accessibility. "Only when Invisible," for example, is -10%, since invisibility is a voluntary condition and one that has advantages.
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
07-31-2024, 09:36 AM | #3 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
Re: Lifting ST (only for 'advantage')
2.7 for something which only affects how much you can bring and remain invisible (etc.) seems awfully high.
Remember, it's not about how much you carry - all your encumbrance levels remain the same - but how much you can "make invisible". So for someone with ST 10, that increases the amount he can make invisible from 20 to 24 lbs., but he'd still lose Move and Dodge at 20 lbs.
__________________
“When you arise in the morning think of what a privilege it is to be alive, to think, to enjoy, to love ...” Marcus Aurelius Author of Winged Folk. The GURPS Discord. Drop by and say hi! Last edited by Anders; 07-31-2024 at 09:46 AM. Reason: clarification |
07-31-2024, 10:08 AM | #4 |
Join Date: Feb 2014
|
Re: Lifting ST (only for 'advantage')
Compare to the point breakdown of whatever "can carry next weight category" enhancement already exists for the advantage(s) as a sanity check.
|
07-31-2024, 12:08 PM | #5 | |
Night Watchman
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cambridge, UK
|
Re: Lifting ST (only for 'advantage')
Quote:
__________________
The Path of Cunning. Indexes: DFRPG Characters, Advantage of the Week, Disadvantage of the Week, Skill of the Week, Techniques. |
|
07-31-2024, 10:21 AM | #6 | |
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Re: Lifting ST (only for 'advantage')
Quote:
Since the cost of these is not fixed (the enhancement values vary for some of them, and of course the base costs can be quite different) dodging around those costs by trying to build the same effects from another trait seems likely to be an exercise in munchkinism to try to score a lower cost. If it isn't, well, it's still a lot of effort to duplicate something there is already a reasonable rule for. Two reasonable rules actually, since anything you put into Payload counts as zero encumbrance for such advantages - again not exactly the same effect, but quite close.
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
|
07-31-2024, 10:43 AM | #7 |
☣
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southeast NC
|
Re: Lifting ST (only for 'advantage')
And if you absolutely must, come up with intermediate (and possibly "off the chart") levels.
__________________
RyanW - Actually one normal sized guy in three tiny trenchcoats. |
07-31-2024, 11:04 AM | #8 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
Re: Lifting ST (only for 'advantage')
A solution in search of a problem? Well, not all ideas can be winners.
Thanks everyone!
__________________
“When you arise in the morning think of what a privilege it is to be alive, to think, to enjoy, to love ...” Marcus Aurelius Author of Winged Folk. The GURPS Discord. Drop by and say hi! Last edited by Anders; 07-31-2024 at 11:24 AM. |
07-31-2024, 11:21 AM | #9 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Re: Lifting ST (only for 'advantage')
Probably. I think if I really wanted to build a scheme to do this, I'd start from Payload rather than Lifting ST. It works more or less the same way, depending on multiples of BL, but avoids any of the implications of the words "Strength" (and "Lift") you are removing from the trait.
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
07-31-2024, 11:27 AM | #10 |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Lifting ST (only for 'advantage')
Yes, I think I agree with Malloyd. Your proposal is just too complicated and fussy. If you want to carry more, you buy a higher level of Carrying Capacity. Having intervals more finely divided than encumbrance levels seems like more resolution than there's any real need for.
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
Tags |
advantages, perks, rules |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|