Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > The Fantasy Trip

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-04-2023, 08:27 PM   #1
Shostak
 
Shostak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: New England
Default Movement, Actions, and Unfolding Narrative

This comment from Steve Plambeck:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Plambeck View Post
I've sometimes wondered just how the rules intended us to view reloading a bow, starting with regular bows. Does it start immediately after firing, in which case the Movement Phase was spent aiming? Or does one spend the Movement Phase reloading, to be ready to fire later in the same turn? Does it even make any difference how that is interpreted?
reminded me of a conversation with forum member Timm Meyers. We were discussing some equestrian combat house rules and how well they supported a coherent story.

One of the things that came up was how every game will impose an artificial framework that breaks a seamless set of fluid movement and actions into understandable and adjudicable bits. If one takes these bits too literally, the resulting narrative will seem unbelievable. Take TFT’s splitting a turn into Movement and Action phases, with the former coming first. Let’s picture a scene unfolding:
Wielding a broadsword and shield, Zelzubar runs at axe-man Bir-Birian. Coming adjacent to Bir-Birian, he stops. Glancing around, he sees all of his comrades advancing on their stock-still opponents. Bir-Birian swings his axe. Zelzubar blocks the axe with his shield, then coils himself to spring at his foe, shield-rushing him to the ground. Zelzubar stands above Bir-Brian briefly before running off at another enemy.

It would look ridiculous. The phases of the turn are a convenience, no more. If we understand the turn as being convenient rather than narratively constraining, we can arrive at a more believable story:
Wielding a broadsword and shield, Zelzubar runs at axe-man Bir-Birian while their respective comrades chaotically engage each other in deadly feints and rushes. As Zelzubar barrels at him, Bir-Brian swings his hatchet, but it is deflected as the swordsman, smashing into him with his shield, bowls him over and speeds onward to other foes.


Timm liked to use the analogy of a film roll that can’t be viewed until all the events of the turn have informed all the others, or even until after the events of several turns have.

It’s easy (and I’m as guilty as any) to fall into a rules-driven approach to combat, mechanically declaring actions, roll results, recording damage, and forgetting to take a little time to describe the story that the rules help create.
__________________
* * * *
Anthony Shostak
myriangia.wordpress.com
Shostak is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
abstraction, actions, rules, story, turns

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.