11-18-2020, 09:08 PM | #11 |
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
Re: Asteroids vs Planetary Mines
Mining the Earth core would probably result in an extinction level event. The core rotates faster than the surface, so you could need to slow the core to have a stable mining structure. Doing so would weaken the Earth's magnetic field, eventually dooming all life on Earth.
|
11-18-2020, 09:32 PM | #12 | |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Asteroids vs Planetary Mines
Quote:
|
|
11-18-2020, 09:41 PM | #13 |
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Denver, CO
|
Re: Asteroids vs Planetary Mines
Something often forgotten in these anslyses is the human factor. Even at TL10, living on a planet is much nicer than living in space. And mining is a process that, barring an aggressive AI track, requires a bunch of humans. Personal costs could easily be 100x as high for an asteroid mine. The company has to pay workers for the inconvenience and provide facilities. Planetside, it's just labor.
Then there's environmental regulations. In one of Peter F Hamilton's books, he had "industrial planets" where mines and factories polluted with little oversight and everyone needed masks just to go outside. These fed the needs of more "clean" planets where very tight environmental regulations ruled. In this universe, interstellar transport was fast and easy, but any robust trade scheme could support that dichotomy. And human nature certainly does. |
11-18-2020, 09:50 PM | #14 | |
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kentucky, USA
|
Re: Asteroids vs Planetary Mines
Quote:
|
|
11-18-2020, 10:36 PM | #15 | |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: Asteroids vs Planetary Mines
Quote:
I mean, you were talking about how living on a planet is nicer than living in space, but living on a toxified death world is at best not very much nicer than living in space.
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
|
11-18-2020, 10:54 PM | #16 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Asteroids vs Planetary Mines
Lack of a magnetic field would be a problem fairly fast (solar wind strips ozone layer, solar UV cooks surface life) though solutions are lower tech than core mining.
|
11-18-2020, 10:56 PM | #17 |
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
Re: Asteroids vs Planetary Mines
And it is likely much less pleasant to live on a toxic world than on a space station. We have the technology right now to mine asteroids (getting to the Main Belt would be a bit of a challenge, but it is not impossible), and we could do it for relatively cheap right now if we actually wanted to invest in the economies of scale. If the USA, or the EU, or even China was really interested, we could have operational and economically viable mines on 16 Psyche right now, but they decided that staring at their navels was better than stepping up.
I guess the question becomes more about optics and politics than about economics. Governments will likely support planetary mines because they employ planetary populations and governments get elected by happy planetary populations. If a corporation started making money hand-over-fist, they would have to buy off politicians fast because the owners of planetary mines would want them shut down, especially since the salaries associated with off world mining would draw away their best workers and the production from off world mines would crash their markets. |
11-19-2020, 05:12 AM | #18 | ||
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Meifumado
|
Re: Asteroids vs Planetary Mines
Quote:
If so, what happens when we get TL10 hi-res ore maps which show the mining drones where to go more precisely and hence cut down on the amount of waste material extracted? Quote:
If we have an Expanse-like setting, we have the OPA in control of the asteroids, and they may be unwilling to sell minerals to Earth or Mars. The Inners would then have to resort to planetary mining. And then... (spoilers for season 4):
Spoiler:
__________________
Collaborative Settings: Cyberpunk: Duopoly Nation Space Opera: Behind the King's Eclipse And heaps of forum collabs, 30+ and counting! |
||
11-19-2020, 06:04 AM | #19 |
Hero of Democracy
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: far from the ocean
|
Re: Asteroids vs Planetary Mines
The discussion was started talking specifically about an underground planetary mine, rather than open pit mining. With modern technology, underground mining becomes less necessary. Digging complex holes that present a safety hazard chasing the richest ore isn't as much of a winning strategy anymore. The number I see most often is that 85% of all modern mines are open pit. So the classic deep mine is already facing some strong pressure from the same boring techniques that asteroid mining would use. (shovel it in a refine it)
We mine a lot of different things. Heavy metals are probably the thing asteroids are best at providing. How do asteroids do at the following:
__________________
Be helpful, not pedantic Worlds Beyond Earth -- my blog Check out the PbP forum! If you don't see a game you'd like, ask me about making one! |
11-19-2020, 06:42 AM | #20 | |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Asteroids vs Planetary Mines
Grams per metric ton of ore. Which also happens to be parts per million by weight.
Quote:
For most tech, the total volume is still going to matter to some degree. The nanite crawlers still have to make it along the pure gold vein and back, so how long and thin it is through all the rock you're ignoring still matters -- time and energy to make repeated trips down the nano-tunnel. Even if you map the vein precisely, perhaps it's easier simply to vaporize an 2m wide circular tunnel with your mining laser, so people and your laser can get deeper in, and just shove all the plasma through your industrial scale mass spectrograph while you're at it so you don't have to re-smelt it later. |
|
Tags |
mining, space |
|
|