09-23-2020, 11:03 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New mexico
|
Oakeshott Typology Broadswords
Has anyone ever sat down and figured out where various sword types as defined by Ewart Oakeshott fall between regular Broadswords and Thrusting Broadswords? Some seem fairly self-explanatory. For example, I would assume that an Oakeshott Type X would be a Broadsword, while a Type XV would clearly be a Thrusting Broadsword. It seems to me that the Type XIV would probably be the first that could be considered a Thrusting Broadsword, despite Oakeshott grouping them with swords that are designed primarily for cutting. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? and are there any articles or previous threads on this subject that I've missed?
|
09-23-2020, 11:37 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Apr 2015
|
Re: Oakeshott Typology Broadswords
Low Tech pg.55 has details for what it considers a broadsword, and they are (pun intended) quite broad. Anything between 30" and 40" long, intended for single handed use, single or double edged, and either straight or slightly curved can be considered a GURPS broadsword. The only difference to a thrusting broadsword is that it is pointed. To my knowledge all of Oakeshott types feature a tip that is sharpened and pointed, so all of them would qualify as a thrusting broadsword (unless they fell into a different weapon classification entirely, like being considered an estoc, or some sort of two handed sword).
The non-thrusting broadsword entry is suitable for sword-like-objects like a macuahuitl which have a square tip, or a square tipped machete. You could thrust with them, but without any edge or point you are limited to crushing damage. Note that other swords with strange tip geometry often do either crushing (no tip) or cutting (blade curves dramatically at the tip, khopesh or sickle style).
__________________
I run a low fantasy GURPS game: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdo...YLkfnhr3vYXpFg World details on Obsidian Portal: https://the-fall-of-brekhan.obsidian...ikis/main-page |
09-24-2020, 08:36 AM | #3 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: Oakeshott Typology Broadswords
Quote:
If you were wanting to introduce fine distinctions some of the swords mentioend by the OP might only get a +1 Thrust/Impale instead of +2 damage.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
09-24-2020, 03:07 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New mexico
|
Re: Oakeshott Typology Broadswords
Quote:
|
|
09-25-2020, 03:22 PM | #5 | |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central Europe
|
Re: Oakeshott Typology Broadswords
Quote:
It would have been good to call the pointy version a "Broadsword" and use a more specific name for the version without an effective point. The resources available to Evil Steve in Texas in the 1980s just weren't as extensive as they were for the teams of authors writing Low Tech 30 years later. Some swords in Oakeshott types X through XIII (and many smallswords and spadroons) might have an armour divisor with thrusts. They are pointy, but flexible, so not suitable for thrusting at hard targets.
__________________
"It is easier to banish a habit of thought than a piece of knowledge." H. Beam Piper This forum got less aggravating when I started using the ignore feature Last edited by Polydamas; 09-25-2020 at 03:30 PM. |
|
09-25-2020, 03:37 PM | #6 | |
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: earth....I think.
|
Re: Oakeshott Typology Broadswords
Quote:
Most fall under Thrusting Broad sword. A few under Longsword. And the rest (not a lot) under Bastard sword. And lastly thrusting Greatsword. Going off of Albion swords site for reference pics for people to know what I mean: Thrusting Broadswords Type X Type Xa Type XI Type XII Type XIV Type XV Type XVI Type XVIII Type XIX Long Sword Type XVa Type XVIIIc Bastard Sword Type XIIa Type XIII Type XVIa Type XVII Type XVIIIb Type XX Type XXa Thrusting Greatsword Type XIIIa Type XVIIIe I have handled most of these weapons and this is where I would put those types. Maybe a few of the ones under bastard sword can go under longsword, but that requires me to get my hands on them again. |
|
09-25-2020, 08:58 PM | #7 |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: Oakeshott Typology Broadswords
I saw a sword that on a TV show once. The would-be seller clamed it waa authentic but the expert the show called in decided it was a fake. I've never seen an authentic one.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
09-26-2020, 02:51 AM | #8 |
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maitland, NSW, Australia
|
Re: Oakeshott Typology Broadswords
Some Celtic La Tene swords appear to have been made without a thrusting tip.
__________________
Compact Castles gives the gamer an instant portfolio of genuine, real-world castle floorplans to use in any historical, low-tech, or fantasy game setting. |
09-26-2020, 09:10 AM | #9 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: U.K.
|
Re: Oakeshott Typology Broadswords
I was puzzled by the blunt-tipped broadswords when I first ran into GURPS, but I vaguely recalled hearing Celtic swords described that way, so I assumed that it was down to something in Caesar’s Gallic Wars or suchlike. Okay, so it may originally have come from archaeology. Whatever; game designers do sometimes suffer from too-narrow reference pools.
I’ve never had a character I designed use a blunt-tipped broadsword, though.
__________________
-- Phil Masters My Home Page. My Self-Publications: On Warehouse 23 and On DriveThruRPG. |
09-26-2020, 06:25 PM | #10 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: Oakeshott Typology Broadswords
Quote:
People can get crossed up by artificial distinctions in the way material gets presented. If some curator wants to put up a display of "European Swords" and he starts with the Vikings and goes on well into the Renaissance you can get the idea of a steady evolution away from slashing towards thrusting blades. Only if he had started with Roman Spathas those were very sharply pointed and all the Renaissance Falchions (heavy chopping blades) are in another display case if not another museum.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|