Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-28-2014, 09:10 AM   #41
fifiste
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Estonia
Default Re: [RAW] Compendium of Sense Rolls clarifications (looking for one . . .)

BU a rogue with no combat reflexes but a PER score of of 892?
fifiste is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2014, 10:28 AM   #42
johndallman
Night Watchman
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cambridge, UK
Default Re: [RAW] Compendium of Sense Rolls clarifications (looking for one . . .)

Quote:
Originally Posted by fifiste View Post
BU a rogue with no combat reflexes but a PER score of of 892?
Is quietly gibbering in an insane asylum, unable to cope with perceiving the whole world at once ;)
johndallman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2014, 12:14 PM   #43
RogerBW
 
RogerBW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: near London, UK
Default Re: [RAW] Compendium of Sense Rolls clarifications (looking for one . . .)

Quote:
Originally Posted by johndallman View Post
Is quietly gibbering in an insane asylum, unable to cope with perceiving the whole world at once ;)
World?

A mere -158 to your Per roll gets you to the edge of the observable universe. A further -63 lets you resolve a helium atom. Really, how much more Per do you need?
RogerBW is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2014, 01:32 PM   #44
johndallman
Night Watchman
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cambridge, UK
Default Re: [RAW] Compendium of Sense Rolls clarifications (looking for one . . .)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RogerBW View Post
A mere -158 to your Per roll gets you to the edge of the observable universe. A further -63 lets you resolve a helium atom. Really, how much more Per do you need?
I think he wanted to be sure to notice everything important, even when he wasn't paying attention. Per 889 and Unfazeable would probably have been a better build.
johndallman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2014, 02:22 PM   #45
vicky_molokh
GURPS FAQ Keeper
 
vicky_molokh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
Default Re: [RAW] Compendium of Sense Rolls clarifications (looking for one . . .)

Yay, finally, clarifications for the sense roll compendium. (Posting this here in case people want to discuss, since discussions in the uFAQ thread would be inappropriate).

Sense Rolls, Stealth and Camouflage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kromm
This is a long response, so I've had to split it in two to avoid the character limit for a PM. Note that this took a lot of time to write, so I simply can't justify follow-up comments. I hope these answers will suffice!

Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh

Hearing vs. Stealth
Moving quietly normally takes a Stealth roll contested by Hearing. Hearing rolls suffer a -1 penalty for each doubling of distance relative to the 'standard distance'. What is the 'standard distance' at which the Hearing value in the Contest is unmodified?
I'd go with the 1/4 yard implied by High-Tech, p. 158 if the person is truly stalking. The Stealth skill gives -5 when Moving faster than Move 1, however, which is functionally equivalent to +5 to Hearing, making the distance 8 yards at Move 2+. That's too coarse-grained, so I'd prefer to say that base distance equals the stalker's Move. Thus, any combat movement (Move 1+) is audible at full Hearing at one yard; sneaking to within stabbing distance is a simple Quick Contest of Stealth vs. Hearing; and the High-Tech case assumes someone moving at Move 0.25.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh

The only indication I've found was High-Tech 158: 'Leaves rustling, stalking person 40dB(A), 0.25 yards'; that seems to result in a Hearing-2 roll at 1 hex, which is consistent with the Hearing roll to figure where the unseen opponent is in combat (B394).
That -2 is more for "surrounding noises" (p. B358) than for distance. It's also a simplification; note that neither the distance nor speed of an unseen attacker affects this Hearing roll. I wouldn't attempt to rationalize this. If you must, then use standard distance = Move and apply an extra -2 in a fight, so that someone running at Move 5 is heard at -2 at 5 yards, -1 at 2 yards, no modifier at 1 yard. Just stepping a yard means he's heard at -2 at 1 yard (which is the most usual case in combat).

Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh

More on Hearing
The table seems to produce very low chances of hearing normal stuff, such as a mere 50% chance of hearing a normal conversation at 1 yard or a loud conversation or noisy office at 4 yards. Should there be some sort of positive TDM under most noncombat circumstances, perhaps +6 (so that people at 1 yard could always hear each other)?
Vision rolls get +10 for "in plain sight." Those use a progression where every -6 is ×10 – i.e., Vision gets an effective x10^(10/6), or about ×50, range in unchallenging situations. The equivalent for Hearing would be +5 or +6. I'd pick +5, as it's easy to remember and gives ordinary conversationalists a Hearing roll of 15 at 1 yard or 14 at 2 yards, which allows for the occasional "Sorry, what was that?" moment that happens in real life.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh

Sense of Smell
To turn a Canadian song quote into an actual rules example . . . 'I hate it when they go out, and we stay in // And they come home smelling like their ex girlfriends' - well, what are the modifiers to differentiate between two people or whether one person carries the scent of another like that?
That's more a research question than a rules question. As a rough guide, call it -4. That way, Discriminatory Smell's +4 cancels it out. Ordinary people would be rolling against 6, which seems believable given our atrophied olfaction. If the objective is to spot an impersonator, I might give a bonus of +1 to +4 if the person rolling is intimately familiar with the subject – say, +1 for a friend, +2 for a best friend, or +3 for a lover, and another +1 if you've lived with the subject.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh

Smell, Stealth and Range
Stealth is at -5 against Discriminatory Smell; that clears up the stealth part. The unclear part is, how do range modifiers work for smell? Yes, a wind in either direction would throw off the table, but at least what are the default modifiers?
That has never been established. I'd apply standard range modifiers, a separate bonus or penalty for windspeed, bonuses for large sources (say, equal to SM) and strong smells, and up to +5 (for "extra time") for persistent sources. Thus, a huge factory (SM +10) that's a mile away (-18), spewing a foul smell (+4) constantly for days (+5) would be detectable at Smell+1, or possibly Smell+2 or Smell+3 with the right wind. A human (SM 0) a yard or two away (0) wearing strong perfume (+1) in a still room would be detectable at Smell+1 when she walked in, or Smell+2 if she had a lot of perfume on – and you'd add up to +5 after she'd been in the room for a few hours. So don't try Stealth if you like perfume!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kromm
Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh

Scanning Senses
Scanning senses have a designated range, after which they start accumulating stacking -2 penalties per doubling. But what are the modifiers to the Sense roll within the designated range?
There are none. To quote Active Sensors, p. B472: "They can sense objects out to their rated maximum range at no range penalty."

Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh

I mean, I suppose detecting something close to the sensor should be easier to detecting it near the very edge of the designated range. +2 at point-blank? It's kinda weird to have only a 50/50 chance to detect things real close, or even a 25% chance to miss a human-sized target at point-blank with a LADAR or the like. Should they benefit from the Plain Sight modifier? Benefit from it only to offset SM penalties and range penalties?
I would avoid most such complications. Our goal was to get away from the Third Edition model with range penalties and Scan ratings. That said, "in plain sight" appears to be nearly universal, and should apply to these senses. However, if the target is being even a little evasive, or if there's any cover – which is to say, in almost any combat situation – I wouldn't give this bonus. If a high-tech sensor shouldn't believably miss targets inside its range, that's what Acute Senses are for. Acute Radar and Acute Ladar are legitimate, and baseline Scanning Sense acuity assumes human perceptions, not technological ones.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh

Stealth and Camouflage
Camouflage can be rolled to prevent being seen even after a failed Stealth roll; a stationary ambush only requires Camouflage, without Stealth. So Camouflage is of use on the move if vision is more of a concern than hearing . . . but regarding vision, does the Plain Sight modifier apply to trying to see camouflaged targets in the Quick Contest?
No! By definition, camouflaged people or things aren't in plain sight.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh

(On one hand, by the logical reading of the bonus, it shouldn't, on the other, the numbers get weird if just trying to camouflage suddenly denies a whole +10 bonus to the enemy. In fact, this question applies to Stealth too. So far, the cleanest way for me was assuming a +10 included by default, and reduced depending on the amount of cover available down to +0 for ideal cover, with no roll available through a complete wall.)
The +10 never applies in hostile situations where one side would rather not be seen. It's specifically and exclusively for situations where the item of interest cannot avoid being seen . . . Thus, in most cases, using Camouflage or Stealth doesn't instantly give -10, because even someone without those skills would deny the +10 for "in plain sight" unless standing around like an idiot. I'd let any person avoid giving potential foes that +10 simply by asking, though they'd automatically be "up to no good" in the eyes of any cop or soldier (thus the "approach in the open with your hands above your head" order).

Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh

Camouflage says it either makes the user unseen, or provides a -1 to be seen/hit. When does it merely blur the outline for this -1? Can it provide a nastier penalty than -1 and under what circumstances if yes?
That -1 is for a blurry outline vs. ranged attacks. Anything more serious would require advanced tech or superhuman abilities. Obviously, smoke could do it with fairly low tech, but that is unsubtle concealment, not camouflage per se.

Quote:
Originally Posted by vicky_molokh

Sense rolls in general
What amount of time does it usually take for a sense roll, i.e. how soon another one is possible? Should Time Spent modifiers apply, e.g. for slowly scanning everything up to the horizon?
Canonically, Sense rolls are free actions and not subject to time modifiers. If you fail, you can't retry until something changes to improve your Sense roll: the range decreases, the target turns on bright lights or sounds a horn, whatever. I can't think of a fair modifier that wouldn't be a free bonus for everyone outside of combat, though I might be nice and grant someone who's exclusively scanning and doing nothing else the same +2 that Aim would give after three seconds.
__________________
Vicky 'Molokh', GURPS FAQ and uFAQ Keeper
vicky_molokh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2014, 03:55 PM   #46
johndallman
Night Watchman
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cambridge, UK
Default Re: [RAW] Compendium of Sense Rolls clarifications (looking for one . . .)

The Sight, Hearing and Camouflage interpretations look fine to me. I've never really had to worry much about scent, although one stealth-centric character of mine does try to minimise it.
johndallman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2014, 05:05 AM   #47
vicky_molokh
GURPS FAQ Keeper
 
vicky_molokh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
Default Re: [RAW] Compendium of Sense Rolls clarifications (looking for one . . .)

Here is a simplistic calculator for figuring whether it is safe to sneak up under given skill levels. Yeah, it takes a lot of skill to be the Gurkha who sneaks up on enemy patrols/watchmen, cuts their shoelaces and sneaks away without alerting anyone without screwing up every dozen attempts.
__________________
Vicky 'Molokh', GURPS FAQ and uFAQ Keeper
vicky_molokh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2014, 08:17 AM   #48
fifiste
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Estonia
Default Re: [RAW] Compendium of Sense Rolls clarifications (looking for one . . .)

For a more involved sneaking experience I do like Captain Joy's rules.
http://forums.sjgames.com/showpost.p...38&postcount=8
fifiste is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
camouflage, sense rolls, stealth

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.