08-24-2020, 06:29 PM | #11 | |
Join Date: Dec 2013
|
Re: Bomb-in-head disadvantage?
Quote:
__________________
In which I post about a TL9-10 solar system http://forums.sjgames.com/showthread.php?t=169674 If you don't know why I said something, please ask. Assumptions are the death of courtesy. Disappointed in the behaviour I have too-often encountered here. |
|
08-24-2020, 07:35 PM | #12 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
Re: Bomb-in-head disadvantage?
Ultra-Tech has the Bomb Implant (p. 210), which gives an Involuntary Duty.
__________________
“When you arise in the morning think of what a privilege it is to be alive, to think, to enjoy, to love ...” Marcus Aurelius |
08-24-2020, 07:43 PM | #13 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Bomb-in-head disadvantage?
It's well within the prerogatives of the GM to make your PCs head explode for breaking an involuntary duty.
|
08-24-2020, 07:56 PM | #14 |
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
Re: Bomb-in-head disadvantage?
Cranial bombs are so crude though. A proper cyberpunk world would use a small implanted electical device to kill the brain and then claim the still living body as their property.
|
08-24-2020, 08:16 PM | #15 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Bomb-in-head disadvantage?
Nah, just make sure the cranial bomb it large enough to take out nearby targets and then use them as an assassin. Without telling them that's your plan, of course.
|
08-24-2020, 08:44 PM | #16 | |
Join Date: Dec 2013
|
Re: Bomb-in-head disadvantage?
Quote:
And "Disad - Player Character" tends to express itself through a collection of other disads, or an implicit setting disad. Like "Delusion (I can be rich and famous if I loot this dungeon)" Edit: Note: It's entirely possible for a delusion to be true; the only real requirement is that there's no known reason for other people, or perhaps the player character themselves, to believe it.
__________________
In which I post about a TL9-10 solar system http://forums.sjgames.com/showthread.php?t=169674 If you don't know why I said something, please ask. Assumptions are the death of courtesy. Disappointed in the behaviour I have too-often encountered here. |
|
08-24-2020, 09:30 PM | #17 |
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
Re: Bomb-in-head disadvantage?
Isn't there a Perk which allows you to make a mutually-suicidal final strike?
If so, it certainly applies to cortex bomb implants which are big enough to take out those around you. Unless there is no chance of having the bomb deactivated, or there is a chance that your enemies could activate it, I'd be wary of allowing a cortex bomb as a variant of the Terminally Ill disad. It's a lot of points for something that's essentially a plot device to enforce player compliance. Of course, maybe getting -40 or more character points for "Involuntarily passenger on the G&M Railroad" is worth it for certain players. Instead, the "obey or you're dead" aspect of the implant is nothing more than a justification for the Involuntary enhancement to Duty. Likewise, a bomb which goes off if you're captured or if you threaten to reveal certain information might be justification to boost an ordinary Duty to Extremely Hazardous. |
08-24-2020, 10:03 PM | #18 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Bomb-in-head disadvantage?
Honestly, terminally ill isn't a disadvantage I permit in games at all. It's either free points or unplayable.
|
08-25-2020, 12:46 PM | #19 |
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Dakota, USA
|
Re: Bomb-in-head disadvantage?
I don't recall if this was true after revisions by later supplements (Ultra-Tech II, Cyberpunk, etc.), but originally a Cortex Bomb was a -15 point Disadvantage, at least, if points were being charged for cybernetics in the setting. The RAW version also did 1d concussion damage to anyone within a 2-hex radius.
If the setting allows the hacking of such implants, that might be worth some points as well. If someone skilled at hacking computers can force an Involuntary Duty (including one that contradicts the Duty imposed on you through the implant), or just kill you, that could be worth points... unless such risks are common enough for all people due to existing magic, psionics, etc.
__________________
My GURPS Fourth Edition library consists of Basic Set: Characters, Basic Set: Campaigns, Martial Arts, Powers, Powers: Enhanced Senses, Power-Ups 1: Imbuements, Power-Ups 2: Perks, Power-Ups 3: Talents, Power-Ups 4: Enhancements, Power-Ups 6: Quirks, Power-Ups 8: Limitations, Powers, Social Engineering, Supers, Template Toolkit 1: Characters, Template Toolkit 2: Races, one issue of Pyramid (3/83) a.k.a. Alternate GURPS IV, GURPS Classic Rogues, and GURPS Classic Warriors. Most of which was provided through the generosity of others. Thanks! :) |
08-25-2020, 12:50 PM | #20 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
|
Re: Bomb-in-head disadvantage?
Sounds powerful for a perk. Build it as an ability at 1/5 normal cost (the usual cost for "one-use"). There is a perk that guarantees you'll go out with a bang, though.
__________________
“When you arise in the morning think of what a privilege it is to be alive, to think, to enjoy, to love ...” Marcus Aurelius |
Tags |
delay, triggered delay |
|
|