02-13-2022, 11:45 AM | #31 |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lynn, MA
|
Re: Modelling Equal Gender Appeal
Questions of Disguise, and different applications of Sex Appeal (Which seems to keep getting defended as useful to things other than seduction, when I do not believe anyone called that into question) are great subjects for another thread, but are getting off track of the OP actually is asking, which is...
What trait can they take to be able to say they are... "a man who even the men want" and "the character could use Sex Appeal on/against others regardless of gender." I take this to mean that without preparation, the character walks into a room and anyone interested in either gender who see them think "I can work with that..." on a romantic/sexual level, so they are receptive to Sex Appeal attempts once they are made. Or that they are so skilled in a technique for breaking down people's barriers that they are able to seduce people into thinking about 'crossing over' for an encounter (so they can be "vamped" for any application of Sex Appeal, not necessarily seduced into a sexual encounter). IMO - Androgynous as an appearance modifier or as a perk is insufficient, as it requires you to "dress the part" and as a result does not apply to those only interested in one gender when the character is presented as a different one, or their gender is ambiguous which has it's own set of complications. Neither trait will allow someone who is clearly of a particular gender to use sex appeal on someone not attracted to that gender (I know the writer of many GURPS books including Social Engineering has said I was wrong about this, but outside of Social Engineering (which I don't have) I can't find anything to support that statement. I'm not fond of being wrong, so I'd like to know where my flaw lies. Can someone with Social Engineering comment if there is a relevant wording change for one of the involved traits that change Sex Appeal or Androgynous in a relevant way?) ------------------------------------------ Questions for the OP:
Spoiler:
|
02-13-2022, 12:21 PM | #32 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Modelling Equal Gender Appeal
Quote:
Consider, for example, a man who is a committed monogamist and who is genuinely passionate about his wife. He meets a beautiful woman. His reactions to her in general are at +4 (not +2, as they would be for a handsome man). And if she attempts to gain his help using Sex Appeal, it's not impossible that she might succeed, and in any case she would get +4 to her Sex Appeal roll if she got to attempt one at all. And all of this is even though he is not going to go to bed with her and she may not even be offering that. Now, if she were a man, he would get +2 to reaction rolls, but he would not even be able to attempt Sex Appeal rolls against this monogamist, not because he's monogamous, but because he's not even abstractly or potentially interested in a male partner. But what if he's an Androgynous man? The reaction bonus is +3, not +2. That extra +1 must come from the fact that he looks a bit femme. It's not because he's mistaken for a woman, because the rules say nothing about "passing" in this case. And it's not because there's sexual intent, because the monogamist is still heterosexual and knows that the androgyne is a man. It's purely an aesthetic response to appearance. So does that extra +1 apply to Sex Appeal rolls, and does the androgyne get to MAKE Sex Appeal rolls to straight men? I agree that that's debatable and any answer must be speculative. But I might allow it, to represent a specific response: the perception of physical beauty and in particular the perception of the beautiful woman this man might be were he a woman. That bonus wouldn't be usable to get a straight man, or an exclusively gay woman, or a monogamist of any orientation into bed, or perhaps into any physical contact; but it might be usable to get them to do other things that the androgyne wanted.
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
|
02-13-2022, 12:47 PM | #33 | |
☣
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southeast NC
|
Re: Modelling Equal Gender Appeal
Quote:
It's akin to the question of how to apply Cannot Wear Armor to a character who lacks natural DR.
__________________
RyanW - Actually one normal sized guy in three tiny trenchcoats. |
|
02-13-2022, 01:14 PM | #34 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: Modelling Equal Gender Appeal
Quote:
There's a combat-themed Perk that allows for substiuttion of a different Weapon Skill with a weapon that Skill does not necessarily cover. So you need to create a new Perk that allows the possessor to use Sex Appeal when people without the Perk have to use a different Skill.
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
02-13-2022, 01:18 PM | #35 | |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: Modelling Equal Gender Appeal
Quote:
(b) Any character can attempt Sex Appeal rolls. If you're Ugly, you roll vs. Sex Appeal-4, but hey, you might have a critical success . . .
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
|
02-13-2022, 01:30 PM | #36 | |||
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lynn, MA
|
Re: Modelling Equal Gender Appeal
Quote:
"You are perceived as a viable sexual partner buy those with a different orientation than your presented gender." No one is arguing that the access to Sex Appeal for use with an oppositional preference would be specifically aspected for "getting people into bed", just for the switch to be flipped to enable the skill's use in this usually forbidden context. Depending on the game, This could be just its own custom perk (but not, I think, an existing one), or added special benefit of a technique or modeled in any number of ways. Quote:
You can use Sex Appeal for any number of social interactions to be sure, but for it to work for anything, the person you're working your magic with has to have the undertone that "this is someone I would want to have sexual contact with" regardless of the promise of actual contact, the base desires and the flattery of being appealed to on this level are enough to sway people, even if their situation is such that they would never agree to go through with said contact. Quote:
...when you called me out, where had I gone wrong? |
|||
02-13-2022, 01:56 PM | #37 | ||||
Join Date: Aug 2018
|
Re: Modelling Equal Gender Appeal
Quote:
Expressions like "even men want" or "even the ladies like" of course rely on the stereotype that "men prefer beauty" and "women prefer handsomeness" which are associations which (while probably describing average/majority trends) may not even hold true amongst heterosexuals. You could for example have a heterosexual man who prefers handsome women to beautiful women, or a heterosexual female who prefers beautiful men to handsome men. Quote:
Social Engineering pg 29 treats "attracted to the person's sex" like a fixed criteria. Plus this raises the question as to whether bisexuality in gurps has only drawbacks (you can be manipulated by a wider range of people since you are attracted to a wider range of people) that might make it a quirk, or some kind of benefit (maybe people could get bonuses when attempting to do something on behalf of someone they are in love with?) that would balance it as a 0pt feature. I also think we should recognize interim states, like "heteroflexible" falling somewhere between hetero and bi, and "homoflexible" falling somewhere between bi and homosexual. Or we could also classify that as androsexual/androflexible/bisexual/gynecoflexible/gynecosexual How many interim tiers you use depends on how many +1 tiers you want to assign per gradient I guess. IMO we should probably redo the "Appearance Levels" category, and rather than have a bunch of confusing words, just rank it numerically like what's done with Charisma. IE the baseline could be "Impressive 1, Impressive 2, Impressive 3" when talking about advantages. There doesn't seem to be a "negative Charisma" for negative numbers but you could probably do that. I think we basically need a lot of "under the hood" analysis. Like for example, why is there a "-2 instead of +2 from same-sex who have -4 in other reactions" for VH/VB but nothing like that for normal Handsomeness or Beauty? I don't really think something like that should be uniform: there should be people out there who don't irrationally react worse to very handsome/beautiful characters simply due to hating them for other reasons. If we consider that the baseline then there ought to be some kind of "I don't overreact to attractiveness" perk to ignore that "+2 becomes -2" issue. That's only for crossing the species gap not the sex gap Quote:
"Attractive" is inherently androgynous yet I don't think that enables Sex Appeal to be used against those not attracted to your sex. Quote:
For example, you have Bugs Bunny dressing up as a lady to use Sex Appeal on Elmer Fudd, who is into it when he thinks Bugs is a lady, but not when he realizes Bugs is Bugs. But that type of thing involves some combination of androgynous looks (or conversely, opposite-sex looks: handsome women and beautiful men) or the Disguise skill. Last edited by Plane; 02-13-2022 at 02:06 PM. |
||||
02-13-2022, 01:56 PM | #38 | |||
Join Date: Jun 2013
|
Re: Modelling Equal Gender Appeal
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Putting it all together, my inclination would be that, to make a character who can convince even those who are not attracted to his/her sex to sleep with him/her, you first need some way to be able to use Sex Appeal on your target (androgynous appearance, or the Perk Fred Brackin suggested), then you need a Perk that makes it so anyone you can use Sex Appeal on can be convinced to sleep with you, regardless of their actual orientation (but note you don't have to actually use Sex Appeal, any other influence skill should be able to convince them to sleep with you, as normal). The GM can still override this in certain cases - a truly dedicated monogamist, someone who is very serious about their Vow of Chastity, etc, would still be unwilling to sleep with you (just as the GM can decide an NPC's reaction to you, regardless of what your stats are - sure, most people react to you at +20, and you have literal worshippers, but the High Priest of the Dark God doesn't care about that, he wants you dead).
__________________
GURPS Overhaul |
|||
02-13-2022, 03:21 PM | #39 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pioneer Valley
|
Re: Modelling Equal Gender Appeal
Stipulating so, then wouldn't you agree that (say) me grilling you over whether you know what you're doing to the degree you're involving sexuality at your gaming table would be a pretty frigging impertinent question?
__________________
My gaming blog: Apotheosis of the Invisible City "Call me old-fashioned, but after you're dead, I don't think you should be entitled to a Dodge any more." - my wife It's not that I don't understand what you're saying. It's that I disagree with what you're saying. |
02-13-2022, 03:36 PM | #40 | |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Lynn, MA
|
Re: Modelling Equal Gender Appeal
Quote:
Since the OP isn't interested in embracing androgyny or exploiting ambiguity and is expressing a desire to attract those with an orientation counter to their gender presentation, I'm having trouble seeing why androgeny (without some form of further modification) is part of the discussion at all. |
|
Tags |
affliction, malediction |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|