12-14-2010, 12:34 PM | #41 | |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cowtown, Canada
|
Re: How hard is orbital bombardment
Quote:
I'm pretty sure it was put in to obey the 'rule of cool', but somebody might also have thought about a particle bolt being charged. Or they figured it would warp reality somewhat. The Psi powers seemed to tend to do that.
__________________
FYI: Laser burns HURT! |
|
12-14-2010, 12:43 PM | #42 |
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Re: How hard is orbital bombardment
In anime, an area with high active power density always results in stuff floating - rocks, hair, etc. Ever seen Dragon Ball Z? It's just one of those anime physics things - right next to "constant thrust = constant velocity in space," "the human body contains at least 9 gallons of blood under high pressure," "blades make perfectly clean cuts," and of course "evil has a higher wavelength than good, thus it results in a red aura as opposed to good's blue" (humorously enough, this one is actually something of a plot point in a setting/story I may eventually write).
__________________
Quos deus vult perdere, prius dementat. Latin: Those whom a god wishes to destroy, he first drives mad. |
12-14-2010, 01:49 PM | #43 | |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: How hard is orbital bombardment
Quote:
__________________
Fred Brackin |
|
12-14-2010, 05:20 PM | #44 |
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Re: How hard is orbital bombardment
But then targeting is not an issue you are just busting the planet.
|
12-14-2010, 05:23 PM | #45 |
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
Re: How hard is orbital bombardment
Is the SOL Cannon supposed to be Psi-tech?
|
12-18-2010, 11:49 AM | #46 |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cowtown, Canada
|
Re: How hard is orbital bombardment
Akira mostly had cyberpunk tech with no Psi involved. That said, they had gear that could detect Akira's rising power, so they did have some tech that could interact with Psi. I think the SOL Cannon was supposed to be regular ultra tech. I agree with SuedodeuS though; I think it was just one of those anime tropes they threw in.
__________________
FYI: Laser burns HURT! |
12-18-2010, 10:32 PM | #47 |
Join Date: Jun 2010
|
Re: How hard is orbital bombardment
Isn't a MIRV technically orbital bombardment anyway? Since it's mounted on an ICBM which skims the top of the atmosphere and potentially leaves it for a short period, it enters orbit. As such, it fires it's secondaries, resulting in the mutiple warheads, resulting in it being bombardment from orbit. :P
__________________
In the name of Kane #Gurps IRC channel, irc.sorcery.net #gurps |
12-19-2010, 12:24 AM | #48 | |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cowtown, Canada
|
Re: How hard is orbital bombardment
Quote:
The kind of bombardment we're talking about is launched from something in a stable orbit, like a warship or satellite.
__________________
FYI: Laser burns HURT! |
|
12-19-2010, 01:34 AM | #49 |
Join Date: May 2005
|
Re: How hard is orbital bombardment
MIRVs are very different from the kinetic bombs considered here, since they get almost all their destructive energy from the nuclear warhead. For kinetic projectiles from low Earth orbit, the terminal energies are at most about 8 times that of a similar mass of high explosive. For H-bombs, it's more like a few million times.
TeV |
12-19-2010, 04:47 AM | #50 |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: How hard is orbital bombardment
I really like the idea of dropping guided telegraph pole sized rods from orbit, it fits nicely with the sorts of sci fi settings I tend to build and it has the added bonus of having a large number of non-combustable munitions in you ship which reduces the number of weak point that a lucky hit could destroy. The one thing I need explaining is why such munitions won't burn up when colliding with the atmosphere? Asteroids tend to do this when they hit earth atmosphere, even those as large as texas.
|
Tags |
in space, orbital bombardment, planetary siege, space warfare, spaceship |
|
|