![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Portland, Maine
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
- Hail Melee Fantasy Chess: A chess game with combat. Don't just take the square, Fight for it! https://www.shadowhex.com |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Join Date: May 2024
|
![]()
That's what I ended up settling on as well.
The handwave / in-setting justification I used is that the silver-to-gold ratio was originally 10:1, but then shifted over time to 100:1, with 'gold' coins becoming more and more debased until they were less than 10% gold, with the remainder being close to equal proportions of silver and copper. Then caches of "old" gold coins were discovered and started to circulate at a ratio of 100 silver to each old-gold coin. The debased coins started to be referred to as 'electrum' pieces, and new, un-debased gold coins started to be minted with a face value of 100 silver dollars.
__________________
I was denied tenure at IOU. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Join Date: May 2024
|
![]() Quote:
Which is why the silver-to-gold ration is fixed at whatever ratio: When excessive amounts of silver come on the market, lowering the price of silver relative to gold, then alchemists profit by transforming the excess silver into gold. And vice versa when there's a shortage of silver, raising its price relative to gold. (This also occurs in Etan, but it's a much less important process there.)
__________________
I was denied tenure at IOU. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|