07-14-2009, 08:45 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Flushing, Michigan
|
Magic without Magery
I was playing around with some ideas and realized something...
In Lovecraft, magic doesn't appear to require Magery. Anyone can learn spells. Usually, this is very hard, and a really bad idea, but it can be done. So it got me thinking about how magic is generally handled in GURPS. Standard spellcasting uses Magery, which is described in a way that suggests it is an innate talent (sensing magic objects, etc. implies someone has a "gift" rather than a learned skill). One is somehow in tune with the magical energy of the universe (mana) and can tap into it and shape it. The learned part is the ability to focus this energy for specific effects, not the basic ability. So I started thinking about two questions... 1) What kinds of magic do not normally require Magery ...and... 2) If you're not born with Magery, but it's not something you can simply learn through study, are there any ways to gain it later in life? Some initial thoughts... * Symbol Drawing does not require Magery. It is implied that the symbols themselves are a kind of lens or gate that focuses magical energy for certain purposes (I can imagine some really interesting, elaborate forms of Symbol Drawing. Consider Symbol Drawing (Goetia), where each symbol skill lets you summon a different demon who will complete one task for you...but if you fail your skill roll, you may find yourself at the mercy of an angry prince of the infernal realms!) * Alchemy does not require Magery; it is simply magical chemistry (Alchemy could also be greatly expanded...along with the various elixirs in Magic, there are lots of interesting things one could do with Alchemy. For example, perhaps certain elixirs will compel a spirit to show up and talk to you...sort of like going "Treat! Treat!" except you're calling something a bit more dangerous than a housecat.) * Magical powers do not require Magery (but may use a Magic Talent to boost skill, etc.) * Clerical magic uses Power Investiture, which comes from an external source. Again, this is not learned, but presumably it could be granted either at birth or later in life as a reward for devotion, etc. * Certain kinds of Path/Book magic do not require Magery...if it is part of a religion, one can replace Ritual Magic with Religious Ritual. (Since most such users of magic probably have Theology, too, it's actually the same cost, except you don't need Magery (Path/Book)). * If a setting is high mana (either everywhere and all the time or "when the stars are right" or "amid the sacred stones" etc.) one would not need Magery for basic spellcasting. * For clerical magic, one might not even need Power Investiture, if Religious Ritual skill lets one sanctify a location...if a location is high sanctity, I think one can cast clerical spells without Power Investiture. (Am I getting this one right?) * As for gaining Magery later if life, perhaps an elaborate ritual (Ritual Magic) or elixir (Alchemy) could do it? Any other thoughts on all this? |
07-14-2009, 09:03 AM | #2 |
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Medford, MA
|
Re: Magic without Magery
Actually you don't necessarily need Magery for Path/Book magic at all...not just theological. Ritual Magic skill does not require Magery...and the Magery advantages doesn't do much for the Path/Book Mage.
Path/Book would be...in my mind...the exact version to use for Lovecraftian magic. |
07-14-2009, 09:05 AM | #3 |
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Re: Magic without Magery
I suggest looking at a variant of the spirit-granted magic thing, in Thaumatology; where you can learn easier spells, without defaults, and cast without paying FP and possibly without Magery, but there's a price afterward. This seems, mechanically, well suited to a Call of Cthulhu type of magic, though you'll probably have to rework the fluff behind it.
|
07-14-2009, 09:41 AM | #4 |
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Meifumado
|
Re: Magic without Magery
It's interesting to note that Mana as a physical characteristic of the local geography is also fairly peculiar to GURPS. (Computer games especially generally use the term to mean FP for magic use.) There's nothing wrong with Mana, it's just that it's usually a hidden assumption that people miss.
I think the system could easily stand as is if you ignore Mana as well as Magery (well, Magery 0 at least, you could keep Magery purely as a Talent) and it would fit a lot of fiction easily that way.
__________________
Collaborative Settings: Cyberpunk: Duopoly Nation Space Opera: Behind the King's Eclipse And heaps of forum collabs, 30+ and counting! |
07-14-2009, 09:52 AM | #5 | |
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Medford, MA
|
Re: Magic without Magery
Quote:
It isn't peculiar to GURPS. |
|
07-14-2009, 10:00 AM | #6 | |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Flushing, Michigan
|
Re: Magic without Magery
Quote:
I imagine that some kinds of Path/Book magic do require Magery and others, more akin to Symbol Drawing, do not. That's just a 0-point feature of a particular tradition and/or a particular setting. (A meta-game issue is coming up with the right names for different magical traditions so that people don't get them mixed up.) (Of course, now we get into all the "What happens if they go to a different timeline with different physical laws and now they need Magery?" questions, but I've decided to treat those as "It's a 0-point feature that some powers, spells, etc. work differently or simply don't work at all in certain timelines.") Mark |
|
07-14-2009, 10:18 AM | #7 | |
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
|
Re: Magic without Magery
Here's one more option, from Thaumatology p.58:
Quote:
|
|
07-14-2009, 10:53 AM | #8 | |
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Eindhoven, the Netherlands
|
Re: Magic without Magery
Quote:
And GURPS's approach isn't really "written in." It's more of a way to standardize setting assumptions: In one setting, there is no magic at all ("No mana"). That might represent the typical modern-day Action game, where magic simply doesn't exist or play into it. In another setting, magic is everywhere and anyone can do it (your typical folk-tale setting. I believe GURPS Celtic Myth assigned High Mana to everything). In yet another setting, magic is everywhere, but only some people ("Mages") can do it, like in Dungeon Fantasy. I believe the typical Cthulhu-type setting (or any other "Secret Magic" setting) is typically low mana: some special people can do magic, but it's difficult and doesn't do much. This codification exists so you can easily plug and play certain assumptions, and you know what happens when people from a Dungeon Fantasy world pile into an Action world (ie, their magic stops working, and the dragons begin to die). Of course, as the OP points out, not every setting fits into these neat categories (The actual Cthulhu books suggest that anyone can do magic, that it's small and subtle, but still a spectacularly bad idea, suggesting that it's both High Mana and Low Mana at the same time), but that's why we have Thaumatology! |
|
07-14-2009, 03:26 PM | #9 | |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Magic without Magery
Quote:
One option here is to assume there are places with high or better mana and that they are common (usually dank basements or long abandoned farms where some grisly death occured years ago). A second assumption is that there are magery less spells that will let a caster contact some Entities from Beyond and communicate with them. Under these conditions a person qualifies to buy Magery levels with the Pact Limitation.
__________________
...().0...0() .../..........\ -/......O.....\- ...VVVVVVV ..^^^^^^^ A clock running two hours slow has the correct time zero times a day. |
|
07-14-2009, 03:57 PM | #10 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Magic without Magery
Thaumatology p.66 suggests that access to clerical spells might be enabled by advantages such as Blessed or True Faith, by the Disciplines of Faith disadvantage, or by divine fiat. Something similar might be applied to spirit-based magic, with access to spells or rituals ultimately deriving from the goodwill or interest of the spirit community and possibly being represented by advantages such as Channeling or Medium.
Similarly, I wouldn't have a problem with Trained By a Master providing access to a handful of chi-like spells - although between Cinematic skills, Imbuements, and Chi Powers, there would rarely be a need for such a thing. Likewise, I could see an alternative to traditional GURPS psionics where a handful of "gateway advantages" such as Empathy or Danger Sense open up the potential for learning "psychic skills" - i.e., spells organized around the various psychic categories. |
Tags |
magic, thaumatology |
|
|