05-25-2009, 06:55 PM | #1 |
Untitled
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: between keyboard and chair
|
[meta] Standardizing Tags
They're doing this over on the GURPS forum, and I though it was a good idea... especially since we aren't anywhere near as far into the process as they are.
Tags are useful for finding threads, but only if the tags are consistent - a mishmash of tags only helps Alaemon keep things secret. Thus, I propose a few standardized tags, based on what we've already got: EDIT: Consolidated list here - keeping the old list as a historical artifact. The category names from the In Nomine Collection, which should be obvious:
Terms that already have specific meaning in IN:
And, finally, meta for discussions (like this one) that are about the forum or the regulars instead of about the game. Suggestions, additions, deletions?
__________________
Rob Kelk “Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.” – Bernard Baruch, Deming (New Mexico) Headlight, 6 January 1950 No longer reading these forums regularly. Last edited by robkelk; 08-05-2009 at 06:11 PM. Reason: added pointer to consolidated list |
05-25-2009, 07:06 PM | #2 |
Petitioner: Word of IN Filk
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Longmont, CO
|
Re: [meta] Standardizing Tags
It's a minor thing, but "music" might be a viable tag for threads such as "Music for the Superiors" or "Music for the Choirs/Tunes for the Bands." (Not to mention my own filk, already tagged as "humor.")
Alternatively, there could instead be a "pop culture" tag -- this covers not only the song-related threads, but situations like "Who would you cast in In Nomine: The Movie?" or "Superiors and their TV shows." Those kind of threads seem to pop up with a fair amount of regularity.
__________________
“It's not railroading if you offer the PCs tickets and they stampede to the box office, waving their money. Metaphorically speaking” --Elizabeth McCoy, In Nomine Line Editor Author: "What Doesn't Kill Me Makes Me Stronger" |
05-25-2009, 07:08 PM | #3 |
Untitled
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: between keyboard and chair
|
Re: [meta] Standardizing Tags
I knew I was forgetting something... I'll wait until more folks have had a chance to see the list before I update it, though.
Oh, and canon should be "Setting As Written", not "Rules As Written".
__________________
Rob Kelk “Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.” – Bernard Baruch, Deming (New Mexico) Headlight, 6 January 1950 No longer reading these forums regularly. |
05-25-2009, 07:40 PM | #4 |
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bellflower, CA
|
Re: [meta] Standardizing Tags
What about tags for topics brought about by people like me, who are still somewhat new to it all and are not sure what falls under what?
|
05-25-2009, 08:19 PM | #5 |
Untitled
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: between keyboard and chair
|
Re: [meta] Standardizing Tags
Tags aren't required... and anybody can add a tag to a thread. (The person who starts the thread can add more tags than anyone else.)
__________________
Rob Kelk “Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.” – Bernard Baruch, Deming (New Mexico) Headlight, 6 January 1950 No longer reading these forums regularly. |
05-25-2009, 08:38 PM | #6 |
Petitioner: Word of IN Filk
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Longmont, CO
|
Re: [meta] Standardizing Tags
Out of curiosity, how would you tag something like my "pronunciation" thread, asking how to properly say the various Choirs and Superiors? Is that "tips," even though I'm seeking advice rather than giving it? Or does it fall under something else?
(Not essential; but I want to make sure I'm understanding the categories correctly. Overall, the list seems to cover most of the bases.)
__________________
“It's not railroading if you offer the PCs tickets and they stampede to the box office, waving their money. Metaphorically speaking” --Elizabeth McCoy, In Nomine Line Editor Author: "What Doesn't Kill Me Makes Me Stronger" |
05-25-2009, 08:39 PM | #7 |
Untitled
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: between keyboard and chair
|
Re: [meta] Standardizing Tags
I'd call it "tips", yes.
And I missed a big one: something for adventures, adventure seeds, and campaigns. Would "adventure", "plot", or something else be better?
__________________
Rob Kelk “Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.” – Bernard Baruch, Deming (New Mexico) Headlight, 6 January 1950 No longer reading these forums regularly. |
05-25-2009, 08:42 PM | #8 |
Petitioner: Word of IN Filk
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Longmont, CO
|
Re: [meta] Standardizing Tags
I could flip a coin between the two. "Plot" covers more ground, but "adventure" seems more intuitive, even when it's campaigns being discussed.
__________________
“It's not railroading if you offer the PCs tickets and they stampede to the box office, waving their money. Metaphorically speaking” --Elizabeth McCoy, In Nomine Line Editor Author: "What Doesn't Kill Me Makes Me Stronger" |
05-25-2009, 08:57 PM | #9 | |
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bellflower, CA
|
Re: [meta] Standardizing Tags
Quote:
When I see "adventure" I think the actual campaign. "Plot" to me covers the beginnings of a potential adventure. |
|
05-25-2009, 09:03 PM | #10 |
Untitled
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: between keyboard and chair
|
Re: [meta] Standardizing Tags
Which is why I asked which term would be better... (Have to logoff now; back tomorrow to see what everyone else thinks.)
__________________
Rob Kelk “Every man has a right to his own opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.” – Bernard Baruch, Deming (New Mexico) Headlight, 6 January 1950 No longer reading these forums regularly. |
Tags |
meta, tags |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|