Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-11-2011, 04:46 AM   #1
copeab
 
copeab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: near Houston
Default [WWII] R-class transport submarine (Italy)

R-class transport submarine
Copyright 2011 by Brandon Cope

One of the practical problems facing the Axis powers was the trade of strategic materials between Europe and the Far Etas. Surface shipping was too vulnerable to the US and British navies and cargo planes over such a long distance were impractical. The solution was to modify long range patrol submarines to carry these important materials. However, such loads were fairly small compared to the displacement of the submarines. In 1942, the Italians laid down the hulls for a new class of large transport submarines which carried four times as much cargo as the patrol sub conversions and double that of the Typ XB (p.W:MP115). This was neither a new nor untested idea; in WWI Germany had sent the merchant submarine Deutschland to the US twice before the US entered the war. There were two holds, one fore and one aft, with two cranes (which folded flush into the deck) for each hold. Only two of the twelve boats ordered were completed, the Remo and Romolo. Launched in late March 1943, both had very short careers, being sunk in mid July 1943 before ever completing a trip to the Far East.

Although the R-class submarines had no effect on the war, in an alternate history campaign they might have some impact. Perhaps the Germans managed to finish some of the boats that were not completed. Also, with some additional life support equipment, the boats could be used as 'amphibious assault' submarines, carrying troops instead of cargo ...

The Remo has a crew of 63. Three 20mm AA guns are carried in single, retractable mounts on the foredeck, afterdeck and platform on the rear of the conning tower. The engines burn 77.5 gallons of diesel fuel per hour of routine usage. The Remo can travel 13,800 miles at 10.5 mph surfaced and 125 miles at 4 mph submerged.

Subassemblies: Medium Destroyer chassis with Sub option +9; sealed Medium Secondary superstructure [Body:T] +3; three retractable full-rotation Mini open mounts #1-3 +0.
Powertrain: 2„970-kW marine diesel engines with 2„970-kW water screws and 118,000-gallon standard tanks; 2„336-kW electric motors with 7.15 million-kWs batteries†.
Occupancy: 16 CS Body, 5 CS Sup Cargo: 400 Body

Armor
Body: 4/55
Sup: 4/55
OM: 0/0

Weaponry
20mm Long Ground AC [OM1-3:F] (2,000).

Equipment
Body: Autopilot; backup driver controls; 5,450-VSP bilge; 15„bilge pumps†; 62„bunks; cabin, 2„2,100-VSP cargo holds; 4„10-ton cranes, 75-man environmental control†; 12„fire extinguishers†; 80-man-days life support†; navigation instruments; precision navigation instruments; 5,670-man/days of provisions; 2-mile passive sonar. Sup: Navigation instruments; 2„20’ 15„ periscopes; 2„very large radio receivers and transmitters; large radio receiver and transmitter, searchlight. OM1-3: Universal mount.
† Full access.

Statistics

Size: 232’„26’„30’
Payload: 1,021 tons
Lwt: 2,606 tons
Volume: 32,650
Maint.: 11 hours
Price: $327,000

HT: 9
HP: 108,000 [Body], 750 [Superstructure], 30 [Open Mounts1-3]

wSpeed: 15
wAccel: 0.1
wDecel: 0.5(0.6)
wMR: 0.05
wSR: 4
Draft: 18'
Flotation Rating 3,125 tons.

uSpeed: 7
uAccel: 0.05
uDecel: 0.3(0.4)
uMR: 0.05
uSR: 4
uDraft: 30'
Crush Depth 100 yards.

Design Notes
The 2,606-ton historical submerged weight was used for underwater performance calculations. Design wSpeed was 13 mph and uSpeed was 8 mph; the historical figures were used instead. The small destroyer chassis was about 1,000 VSP too small for the design; the one chosen, however, leaves a lot of excess space (over 4,000 VSP) that should be ignored.

Two external 533mm torpedo tubes could be fitted to the bow if required, but reloads had to be carried in cargo space and the tubes could only be reloaded when surfaced.

Variants
There were no historical variants of the R-class, although one or two hulls after the war was completed to the point of it being used as floating fuel tanks. In non-historical campaigns, there are a couple of options.

An amphibious assault version might use the rear hold to carry three pinnances (p.W:MP119) and one Ro.43 floatplane (or perhaps a version of the CR.42 (p.W:GL34) equipped with twin floats and folding wings). The front hold would have quarters for 85 troops an 15 crew, mechanics and deckhands for the pinnances and floatplane.

A rather more pulp/cliffhanger exploration version would again use the forward hold for quarters, but with eight roomier cabins and only ten bunks, additional life support and a second galley. The rear hold would be partially given over to three labs, two workshops (Electronics and Mechanics) and a large (for submarines) sickbay, with three beds and a surgery, along with a two small boats (one 25' whaler and one 30' pinnance, both p.W:MP110), with remaining space used for exploration gear and provisions.
__________________
A generous and sadistic GM,
Brandon Cope

GURPS 3e stuff: http://copeab.tripod.com
copeab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2011, 09:58 AM   #2
The Colonel
 
The Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Default Re: [WWII] R-class transport submarine (Italy)

The other, very AH use for one of these might be as the carrier for some Regulus equivalent - perhaps a V1 with some kind of WMD warhead?
The Colonel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2011, 03:24 PM   #3
copeab
 
copeab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: near Houston
Default Re: [WWII] R-class transport submarine (Italy)

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Colonel View Post
The other, very AH use for one of these might be as the carrier for some Regulus equivalent - perhaps a V1 with some kind of WMD warhead?
The biggest problem with that are the actual dimensions of the holds, which I couldn't find. For simplicity, I assumed they were of equal volume, but I don't know if this is the case.

Remember the R-class were only 232' long (they were rather wide, though). Assuming a hold height of 12' and width of 18', this would give each hold a length of 48'. That's just long enough for a V-2 (with perhaps two stacked vertically). Fuel could be stored to the left or right of the rockets and the rockets would be hoisted out of the hold and placed on a launch gantry erected on the deck. V-1's would be a rather less dangerous -- if less effective -- weapon from the crew's perspective (stored with wings removed, or a version with folding wings). However, if the goal is to just "hit New York City" the lack of accuracy is tolerable. Of course, there was a manned V-1 project and it could be superseded by one using a robot brain ...
__________________
A generous and sadistic GM,
Brandon Cope

GURPS 3e stuff: http://copeab.tripod.com

Last edited by copeab; 08-11-2011 at 08:25 PM.
copeab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2011, 04:19 PM   #4
johndallman
Night Watchman
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cambridge, UK
Default Re: [WWII] R-class transport submarine (Italy)

Quote:
Originally Posted by copeab View Post
V-1's would be a rather less dangerous -- if less effective
The V-1 warhead isn't much smaller, and the accuracy isn't a lot worse. And the fuel is so much less hassle; a V-2 would have to be the storable-fuel version, which requires carrying tons of nitric acid. The biggest guidance problem would be knowing just where you were launching from. Regulus boats got to use LORAN and the like, but this wouldn't.
johndallman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2011, 07:37 PM   #5
copeab
 
copeab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: near Houston
Default Re: [WWII] R-class transport submarine (Italy)

Quote:
Originally Posted by johndallman View Post
The V-1 warhead isn't much smaller, and the accuracy isn't a lot worse. And the fuel is so much less hassle; a V-2 would have to be the storable-fuel version, which requires carrying tons of nitric acid. The biggest guidance problem would be knowing just where you were launching from. Regulus boats got to use LORAN and the like, but this wouldn't.
Like I said, there was a project involving piloted versions of the V-1. It was intended to be used against the Allied invasion fleet but the project wasn't far enough along when D-Day came. The German pilots in the program were not as enthusiastic as their Japanese counterparts and were not interested in expending themselves on 'lesser' targets. Now, the Germans might be able to acquire from Japanese pilots for their V-1's as part of the trade using their cargo submarines ...
__________________
A generous and sadistic GM,
Brandon Cope

GURPS 3e stuff: http://copeab.tripod.com
copeab is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
italy, submarine, wwii

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.