12-27-2018, 10:54 AM | #11 |
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kentucky, USA
|
Re: GURPS Space: Carrying Capacity
Most people on Earth are not living at a TL8 Average level, so their resource demands are quite a bit less.
Quality of resource extraction, processing and disposal/recycling is also highly varied. Some areas are on a fast route to exhausting their environment, while others can maintain their activities indefinitely (forests in many industrial nations are expanding due to the switch from old growth logging to tree farming, for example). So, it's complicated. Current situation is not good, but not as bad as that calculation would predict. The future is a moving target, after all.
__________________
GURPS Fanzine The Path of Cunning is worth a read. Last edited by Tyneras; 12-27-2018 at 11:01 AM. |
12-27-2018, 11:06 AM | #12 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: GURPS Space: Carrying Capacity
|
12-27-2018, 11:51 AM | #13 |
Join Date: Feb 2016
|
Re: GURPS Space: Carrying Capacity
The average is TL8 Poor when you account for the difference in GURPS $ and 2018$.
|
12-27-2018, 05:23 PM | #14 |
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oz
|
Re: GURPS Space: Carrying Capacity
According to GURPS Space high tech level increases carrying capacity, it does not reduce it.
__________________
Decay is inherent in all composite things. Nod head. Get treat. |
12-27-2018, 08:30 PM | #15 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: GURPS Space: Carrying Capacity
|
01-16-2019, 12:23 AM | #16 |
Join Date: May 2009
|
Re: GURPS Space: Carrying Capacity
What is the carrying capacity based on? Is it realistic? Unfortunately Gurps Space doesn't give any information about why it says what it says.
|
01-16-2019, 06:10 AM | #17 |
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lawrence, KS
|
Re: GURPS Space: Carrying Capacity
It's worth noting that GURPS Space says explicitly that the figures on carrying capacity for TL8+ are speculative, and that economists and ecologists disagree on them. And of course they have to be; they state that if you're above carrying capacity, you will undergo resource deplation and economic collapse over several generations, but we haven't been at TL8 for multiple generations, so that statement is unfalsifiable. That's not to say it's WRONG; just that it's not based on empirical evidence.
It's not certain, either, that we will ever have that evidence. Will we even stay at TL8 for multiple generations? We were at TL6 for two or three generations, and at TL7 for less than two; we may reach TL9 before many more years. And then the GURPS Space rules make different predictions. Even setting that aside, there's more than one way to model Earth now. The simple model is to say that we have Affinity 8, carrying capacity 2.5 billion, and divisor 3.5, getting us to 7 billion (in between divisor 4, 6.25 billion, and divisor 3, 8.33 billion). But what if we have Affinity 9 for high resources, with carrying capacity 5 billion? Divisor 7 then gets us to 7 billion, which is a lot less strain. And if we reach TL9, carrying capacity is 10 billion, and we're well under that. Basically, there's room to tweak your assumptions to fit what you believe is plausible and/or makes a dramatic setting, even within the rules of GURPS Space.
__________________
Bill Stoddard I don't think we're in Oz any more. |
01-16-2019, 01:07 PM | #18 | |
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Re: GURPS Space: Carrying Capacity
Quote:
__________________
"The navy could probably win a war without coffee but would prefer not to try"-Samuel Eliot Morrison |
|
06-14-2020, 07:13 PM | #19 |
Join Date: May 2009
|
Re: GURPS Space: Carrying Capacity
Earth is experiencing global poverty because of overpopulation?! Where did you get that idea?
|
06-14-2020, 07:31 PM | #20 |
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
Re: GURPS Space: Carrying Capacity
This thread died nearly a year and a half ago. Does it really need to be exhumed?
__________________
I don't know any 3e, so there is no chance that I am talking about 3e rules by accident. |
Tags |
earth, gurps, math, planet generation, question, space, system generation |
|
|