07-28-2015, 08:33 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: 3.165, -3.048, -0.0818
|
Social Vulnerability: Daddy Issues (?)
As the GM, I boasted to a new player that GURPS rules cover *everything*. She looked through the Basic Set and asked me where she could find the following disadvantage: her character would have a weakness for older men. By this she said she means "a powerful tendency to look up to them, whether they deserve it or not."
Sweating a little, I've looked through the rules and at first I thought I wanted to add a modifier to Gullibility to restrict it to a specific group (older men). But wait--Gullibility specifically states it is about "stories" and lying, not influence generally. "Looking up to" someone sounds like general influence. So maybe it is not in the Basic Set. Then I looked to Quirks and I found "Easily Influenced." But these -/+1 modifiers seem very weak for a "powerful tendency." They also depend on the "Influencing the PCs" rule (p. B359), which I don't think I need in this case. I expect the player will do a good job roleplaying it without specific influence skill roll modifiers. (Of course I could always use those rules or roll against Will to resist, or something it if became necessary.) Next I thought maybe the "Preferred Looks" quirk would do it. The definition is right on target, but it still has the problems of "Easily Influenced" (too weak, depends on the "Influencing the PCs" dynamics). But I was thinking that perhaps I could modify it upward with a modifier to make it more powerful. Finally, I looked through Social Engineering and in fact it recommends adapting the Resistant advantage to apply to resisting social influence (p. 77). Since I think the Resistant advantage is the opposite of the Vulnerability disadvantage this tactic should work to modify Vulnerability as well. So with this approach she could take the Vulnerability disadvantage but in social terms, then add a modifier to to restrict it to a specific group (older men). That last option currently seems like the best bet. I'm not sure how to price this though. Or... maybe there is another way I am not thinking of. Everyone on here has such great ideas I thought I would see if anyone had other thoughts about it! I'd appreciate any pointers. |
07-28-2015, 08:44 PM | #2 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: Social Vulnerability: Daddy Issues (?)
Delusion: Older men are wise and benevolent.
|
07-28-2015, 09:56 PM | #3 |
Join Date: May 2009
|
Re: Social Vulnerability: Daddy Issues (?)
Given that (IIRC) Delusions do not have to be falsehoods, a Delusion like this that is sometimes true and sometimes not could definitely work.
|
07-28-2015, 10:43 PM | #4 |
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: 3.165, -3.048, -0.0818
|
Re: Social Vulnerability: Daddy Issues (?)
|
07-28-2015, 10:57 PM | #5 |
Join Date: Feb 2013
|
Re: Social Vulnerability: Daddy Issues (?)
First, you shouldn't have bragged. Second, this is pretty clearly quirk: likes older men.
__________________
Leave this space blank. |
07-28-2015, 11:23 PM | #6 | |
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: 3.165, -3.048, -0.0818
|
Re: Social Vulnerability: Daddy Issues (?)
Ha ha. Yes.
Quote:
|
|
07-29-2015, 12:51 AM | #7 | |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: On the road again...
|
Re: Social Vulnerability: Daddy Issues (?)
Quote:
__________________
"Life ... is an Oreo cookie." - J'onn J'onzz, 1991 "But mom, I don't wanna go back in the dungeon!" The GURPS Marvel Universe Reboot Project A-G, H-R, and S-Z, and its not-a-wiki-really web adaptation. Ranoc, a Muskets-and-Magery Renaissance Fantasy Setting |
|
07-29-2015, 02:41 AM | #8 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Social Vulnerability: Daddy Issues (?)
Delusion is merely a negative social reaction: people think you're "crazy".
Women that like older men aren't crazy whether you think they're icky for having such preferences or not.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
07-29-2015, 02:44 AM | #9 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Social Vulnerability: Daddy Issues (?)
Gullible: only toward older men.
Preference alone is meaningless and liking older men is downright beneficial in most human societies throughout time. Unless it rises to Lecherousness, of course.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
07-29-2015, 07:01 AM | #10 | ||
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: 3.165, -3.048, -0.0818
|
Re: Social Vulnerability: Daddy Issues (?)
Quote:
Quote:
I don't mean to nitpick but I do think a delusion is more than just "merely" a social reaction against you. You "must roleplay your belief at all times." In this way, with this delusion, the player would be compelled to behave differently. That part would work well. Nonetheless, I don't like the fact that the negative reaction modifier is somewhat nonsensical. Maybe gullibility is the way to go. I shied away from it because of the description's emphasis on lies and "ridiculous stories," which seems like just one part of what this player was getting at. |
||
Tags |
disadvantage, gullibility, influence, social engineering, vulnerability |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|