08-05-2014, 03:30 AM | #11 |
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?
This sort of thing seems to assume a class based RPG - I've only encountered it outside class based games in a context where it appears to be a deliberate attempt to mimic the same effect.
The main reason seems to be either PvP balance or niche protection - explanations given as fluff rarely make any sense. And of course, there's "that one specific class based RPG" with its origins in wargaming where "magic users" and "fighting men" were simply different kinds of unit with different capabilities, without needing to probe too far into the underlying reality of the thing. The whole "you can't do it at all because stuff" position is distinctly old school - the modern trend (and the same trend that has always existed in non-class systems) would be towards "you can try, but you'll suck at it" ... which seems far more congruent. Mythically speaking, wizards tend not to wander about in armour (although sword wielding seems reasonably common), but on the other hand they tend not to shoot fireballs either. Also, most mythic wizards are (or appear to be) very old, which may also impair their fighting ability. |
08-05-2014, 08:52 AM | #12 |
Join Date: Jul 2005
|
Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?
The 'no metal' thing appears in EMPIRE OF THE PETAL THRONE too and I'd give a pretty to know if the Professor stuck that in there before he found DnD or after.
It's mostly a niche-protection rules based thing rather than a mythical thing. GURPS magicians mostly want to avoid carrying heavy loads because that cuts into their fatigue points that they're going to be using to power spells. Which doesn't say 'you can't' but rather 'if you do, you're going to have live with these problems'.
__________________
Michael Cule,
Genius for Hire, Gaming Dinosaur Second Class |
08-05-2014, 09:01 AM | #13 |
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Central Europe
|
Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?
And quite a few Robert E. Howard enemies and third parties. Dr. Karadur of Mulvan was too old and frail for armour, and Harold Shea didn't wear armour either ... but early L. Sprague de Camp seems to have got his fencing from the likes of Egerton Castle rather than Alfred Hutton.
__________________
"It is easier to banish a habit of thought than a piece of knowledge." H. Beam Piper This forum got less aggravating when I started using the ignore feature |
08-05-2014, 09:13 AM | #14 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Great White North
|
Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?
Yes, that seems to be derived from folk tales the the magical fair folk, that is, the Fae, cannot abide iron in any form.
__________________
How do you keep a fool busy? Turn upside down for answer. ˙ɹǝʍsuɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn uɹnʇ ¿ʎsnq ןooɟ ɐ dǝǝʞ noʎ op ʍoɥ |
08-05-2014, 09:18 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bristol
|
Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?
I thought it came from the fae myth that had weakness to iron.
|
08-05-2014, 09:18 AM | #16 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Earth, mostly
|
Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?
Thinking back, the limitation on metallic armor in D&D does make at least a little sense - you don't want to go casting Chain Lightning while wearing what is in essence a body-hugging lightning rod...
__________________
If you break the laws of Man, you go to prison. If you break the laws of God, you go to Hell. If you break the laws of Physics, you go to Sweden and receive a Nobel Prize. |
08-05-2014, 09:20 AM | #17 |
Join Date: Jul 2005
|
Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?
|
08-05-2014, 09:29 AM | #18 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Great White North
|
Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?
That would let the lightning go around your body, not through it. It should significantly reduce the damage you suffer.
__________________
How do you keep a fool busy? Turn upside down for answer. ˙ɹǝʍsuɐ ɹoɟ uʍop ǝpısdn uɹnʇ ¿ʎsnq ןooɟ ɐ dǝǝʞ noʎ op ʍoɥ |
08-05-2014, 10:26 AM | #19 |
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?
Hm interesting to hear this all so far, so in fiction wizards never really been armored but that just more or less not soldiers.
Yeah I just keep thinking the whole squishy wizard trope in rpgs is a one of those obvious rule patches that devolped so that classes other then magic users have a point to exist in a party. If magic user had the ability to have as high hp as a warrior and the ability to equip heavy armor without it really effecting magic then what would be the point of any class that did not use magic since at high level magic is very powerful. |
08-05-2014, 05:29 PM | #20 |
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
|
Re: Is The trope that wizards can't use armor just an arbitrary limitation?
I'm 100% with Smurf's thought. "Cold iron" has been the bane of magic and fairie (however you want to spell it) action for a very long time. Yes, even before D&D!
In gaming terms, I've seen many a system (well, more than one) where spell slingers can wear armour, just not iron/steel. The rules then go on to list varieties of "silver alloy" plate for the well-dressed battle mage (with a deep wallet. That silver armour stuff ain't ever cheap!)
__________________
============ "HEY, today you're thinking with your whole head!" -- Spike (of "Sugar & Spike") ============ for a rootin' tootin' good read: Home on the Strange: A Brewster and Brewster Adventure |
Tags |
armor, rules, wizards |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|