04-11-2014, 08:12 PM | #1 |
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
Immunity to Metabolic Hazards
That "all threats that only affect the living" is a bit confusing. So, what exactly does it protect against?
1) Does it protect against the effects of radiation on living things? 2) Does it protect against high and low environmental temperatures? 3) Does it protect against the effects of acceleration? |
04-11-2014, 08:30 PM | #2 | |
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Yukon, OK
|
Re: Immunity to Metabolic Hazards
Quote:
If I recall correctly though the answers are yes, kinda, and yes. |
|
04-11-2014, 11:03 PM | #3 | |||||||
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Immunity to Metabolic Hazards
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
(I suppose you can quibble about low-G effects on bone growth and so on.) Last edited by Anaraxes; 04-11-2014 at 11:18 PM. |
|||||||
04-11-2014, 11:22 PM | #4 | |
Join Date: Nov 2004
|
Re: Immunity to Metabolic Hazards
Quote:
|
|
04-11-2014, 11:53 PM | #5 |
Untagged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
|
Re: Immunity to Metabolic Hazards
Acceleration rules are about the shock and blood pooling issues for us wet meat sacks. For momentary short term impulses, objects are quite resilient.
Only when periods become more medium to long term should you break out the high gravity rules.
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check. |
04-11-2014, 11:55 PM | #6 | |
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Re: Immunity to Metabolic Hazards
Quote:
On the other hand, space sickness is listed under Resistant on B80, if not specifically in the definition of hazards on B81 (but that's a "such as", not an exhaustive list). Powers 40 notes that ItMH stops most Afflictions. That seems to imply any of the Conditions on B429, which include unconsciousness and coma. The most common contrast for Afflictions seems to be between damage, and anything else. By this line of reasoning, ItMH stops just about anything that's not direct HP or FP loss. And then again, there's already an Improved G-Tolerance Advantage. ItMH is only 30 points, so I'm not sure it should incorporate other distinct Advantages. But then, I didn't see any templates with ItMH that felt obliged to include Improved G-Tolerance, even when they did have Pressure and Vacuum Support. (It might be worth checking ones in Hi/Ultra-Tech and Space; I don't have those in PDF.) So there's certainly a good argument for including any non-directly-damaging effects of acceleration in the protection granted by ItMH. |
|
04-12-2014, 12:15 AM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Immunity to Metabolic Hazards
Corebook says:
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
immunity, resistant |
|
|