11-28-2007, 12:54 PM | #71 | |
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
Re: Rate of Fire on a Binding Attack?
Quote:
BTW, Bombardment is a different creature entirely. |
|
11-28-2007, 01:53 PM | #72 | |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
|
Re: Rate of Fire on a Binding Attack?
Quote:
__________________
Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. -RAH |
|
11-28-2007, 02:27 PM | #73 | |
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
Re: Rate of Fire on a Binding Attack?
Quote:
|
|
11-28-2007, 03:06 PM | #75 | |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: in your pocket, stealing all your change
|
Re: Rate of Fire on a Binding Attack?
Quote:
I'd definately want Kromm's opinion on this, as it seams quite abusive in the point-vs-power aspect. If you do ask him Molokh, post the answer, will ya? |
|
11-28-2007, 03:08 PM | #76 |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: in your pocket, stealing all your change
|
Re: Rate of Fire on a Binding Attack?
Mind you, nothing stops us from applying the same principle to a singe point of damage innate attack.
|
11-28-2007, 10:48 PM | #77 |
Join Date: Aug 2004
|
Re: Rate of Fire on a Binding Attack?
*tsk* Proof again that the price of design freedom is eternal vigilance on the GM's part :/
|
11-28-2007, 11:06 PM | #78 | |
Experimental Subject
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: saarbrücken, germany
|
Re: Rate of Fire on a Binding Attack?
Quote:
__________________
Like a mail order mogwai...but nerdier - Nymdok understanding is a three-edged sword
|
|
11-30-2007, 12:06 AM | #79 | |
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Union City, CA
|
Re: Rate of Fire on a Binding Attack?
Quote:
@Guido, this isn't actually particularly Munchkin, if you ask me. It's still a ST1 binding attack with a huge multiplier to cost for the effect essentially being auto-hit, and using my ST/5 solution, it's arguably not worth the cost. It's a 512 yard AoE ST 60 Binding. 231 points for Fully Multiplicative Multipliers (which I would use in a game that allowed this), or... 17 points for non-multiplicative? Binding ST1 = 2 (RoF 300 +300%, AoE 512 +450% = +750% = 15) 2 + 15 = broken. Okay. Don't do this without using full multiplicative multipliers. THEN it's not that munchkin. Still half cost of a ST60 Binding with an AoE of 512, but eh. I don't care that much about it. XD
__________________
BOOM! |
|
12-06-2007, 10:40 AM | #80 |
GURPS FAQ Keeper
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kyïv, Ukraine
|
Re: Rate of Fire on a Binding Attack?
Long story short:
Kromm is very careful about RoF+AE, but recommends Explosion (which I can't figure how to apply to non-damaging effects like Afflictions and Bindings and the like). Kromm says a RFing Binding works the same way as normal Binding for layering purposes (i.e. multiple layers are cumulative whether they hit in the same turn or not). Kromm thinks using X/5 instead of static 1 takes more bookkeeping, but the change won't break anything. |
Tags |
binding, maximum duration, rapid fire |
|
|