09-02-2010, 06:48 AM | #1 |
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Virginia
|
Which TranshumanSpace technology do you think is total bunk?
Skip Mentics and the Black Holes, they were always meant to be WOW factor. Which THS technology do you think is pure Jetsons.
Please give your reasons.
__________________
Per Ardua Per Astra! Ancora Imparo |
09-03-2010, 01:31 AM | #2 |
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles County
|
Re: Which TranshumanSpace technology do you think is total bunk?
Normal computers that can run ghosts. The brain is complicated! You should need a bio-nano-neuro-net or a quantum computer for that.
|
09-03-2010, 06:19 PM | #3 |
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
Re: Which TranshumanSpace technology do you think is total bunk?
Engineered organisms capable of terraforming Mars accidentally in a few decades.
|
09-03-2010, 06:55 PM | #4 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
|
Re: Which TranshumanSpace technology do you think is total bunk?
Or even deliberately.
|
09-03-2010, 06:59 PM | #5 |
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
Re: Which TranshumanSpace technology do you think is total bunk?
|
09-03-2010, 07:43 PM | #6 | |
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Re: Which TranshumanSpace technology do you think is total bunk?
Quote:
Hm, I think the most ridiculous tech is the more or less throwaway "Doolittle virus", which apparently is a contagious cross species method of raising animal IQ. Yeah, right, everybody believes there's a single change you can make in multiple species that will boost intelligence. The fast terraforming of Mars, particularly as a bioengineering project, is pretty ridiculous at the depicted speed, where's the *energy* coming from? But it wouldn't be too bad for a few millenia rather than a few decades, and it's under one of those coolness constraints to run fast enough to matter in the game timeline. I think microscale ultraprecision assembly stuff - 3D printers, bioroids - are considerably overplayed in significance - they'd have to be unreasonably cheap and easy to have the impact they seem to. He-3 fusion isn't bunk in itself, but the portrayal of fusion has been deliberately rigged to make space based He-3 extraction really important. If He-3 works, DT and even DD are easier and doesn't need those resources. For that matter the tritium decay product is He-3, so you don't actually *need* them for even the He-3 reactors, though they might be cheaper when not embargoed.
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
|
09-03-2010, 08:54 PM | #7 | |
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
Re: Which TranshumanSpace technology do you think is total bunk?
Quote:
|
|
09-04-2010, 11:15 AM | #8 |
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Re: Which TranshumanSpace technology do you think is total bunk?
The original reference is on the Most Wanted Criminals list, and hits the Rocky Mountains. So yeah. It's possible it got fixed later.
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
09-04-2010, 12:35 PM | #9 | |
Wielder of Smart Pants
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ventura CA
|
Re: Which TranshumanSpace technology do you think is total bunk?
Quote:
"The Doolittle dolphin was the first stable germline resulting from Applied Ocean Technology's cetacean uplift program." |
|
09-04-2010, 01:02 PM | #10 | |
Join Date: Jun 2006
|
Re: Which TranshumanSpace technology do you think is total bunk?
Quote:
Like I said, it's basically a throwaway idea. It should have been thrown away the rest of the way.
__________________
-- MA Lloyd |
|
|
|