Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > In Nomine

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-26-2024, 02:21 PM   #1
xerxes
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Default modifying the rules

So, I've been thinking of starting a campaign at some point in the future. I ran a brief one about 7 years ago and that was my main experience with In Nomine.

But, I'm thinking of changing some rules.

The books indicate that one must the Sorcery Attunement to practice sorcery. One must have 6 forces for such an Attunement to be attached to the individual. And, having 6 forces is also the requirement for being able to perform songs. But, Songs are so much better than sorcery. It does not seem to make sense to give the Sorcery Attunement to a human when they could simply be taught a variety of Songs.

[side note: I am assuming that any Attunement can only be attached to a being of 6 or more forces even though I did not see that specified in any book.]

However, I do like the idea of having sorcery in the game-world. So, I'm thinking of changing the rules such that an Attunement can be attached to a human of only 5 forces. The Attunement would be the only way that a 5-forcer could intentionally control their Essence.

Does that seem like a game-breaking change?
xerxes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2024, 08:05 PM   #2
ehrbar
 
ehrbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Default Re: modifying the rules

Yes, canonically a human needs to have six Forces to gain an attunement (CPG p.23) or to become a sorcerer (CPG p.32).

No, it won't break anything in particular to let 5 Force humans become sorcerers. They'll have enough trouble actually managing rituals with their low characteristic scores anyway.

Do note that sorcery's classification as an attunement is, well, not exactly correct, mechanically. It probably should have been classed an advantage, since attunements can only be granted by Superiors (CPG p.23), while sorcery can be obtained through an initiation ritual (CPG p.46) or from a demon with the Infernal Pact attunement (CPG p.28).
__________________
Steven E. Ehrbar

GURPS Technomancer resources. Including The Renegade Mage's Unofficial GURPS Magic Spell Errata, last updated July 7th, 2023.
ehrbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2024, 05:36 PM   #3
Bayesmeant
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Default Re: modifying the rules

It depends on your goal here.

If it's "5 Force humans can practice sorcery, now humans everywhere are learning it en masse", well that would certainly break the world if it really happened. As an apocalypse to avert, cool. But a world with loads of sorcerers all around... that would be a *very* different world.

If that's not the point and you want to keep sorcery rare... well, you probably *do* want your sorcerers to be at least a little awesome. And that is usually gonna mean giving them more than 5 forces. Or maybe long term practice of sorcery inherently gets people more likely to get a 6th force?

Now if you are planning for sorcerers to be rare, and sorcerers to be cool, and just sorta questioning "why would they do *this* thing instead of learning Songs? Well, I'd personally just buff sorcery and what it can do.
Bayesmeant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2024, 09:34 AM   #4
johndallman
Night Watchman
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Cambridge, UK
Default Re: modifying the rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by xerxes View Post
But, Songs are so much better than sorcery. It does not seem to make sense to give the Sorcery Attunement to a human when they could simply be taught a variety of Songs.
Consider the motive of someone who's granting a human Sorcery. They're a demon, and they are not interested in making humans capable of competing with celestials. They're interested in motivating the sorcerer to do things that suit the demon, and making it harder for the sorcerer to back out and return to a normal life.
johndallman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2024, 05:06 PM   #5
thorr-kan
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Default Re: modifying the rules

Note that some Ethereals, some Domains, and some Word-bound can grant attunements as well. That argues against an attunement for Sorcery being any different.
__________________
I have a blog; come see what I've created: https://thewhiteminotaur.wordpress.com/
-The 2024 Character Creation Challenge (#charactercreationchallenge):
https://thewhiteminotaur.wordpress.c...tionchallenge/
thorr-kan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2024, 01:30 AM   #6
ehrbar
 
ehrbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Default Re: modifying the rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by thorr-kan View Post
Note that some Ethereals, some Domains, and some Word-bound can grant attunements as well. That argues against an attunement for Sorcery being any different.
Greater gods (EPG p.82) are functionally Ethereal "Superiors" (complete with being unstatted). Intrusive Domain (EPG p.108) goes ahead and explicitly qualifies its effect as "giving them the functional equivalent of an attunement." rather than a real attunement, and you already need both that rare domain feature and an expenditure of power (5 CP) by the domain's master.

And, well. the only case of a Word-bound being able to grant an attunement I can recall is Hatiphas being able to grant Infernal Pact.

So we've got a CPG rules errata ("Only Word-bound celestials can grant attunements")/subsequent GMG parenthetical rule exception (p.11's "they can only come from a Superior (or a Word-bound celestial; see p. 26)") that exists to enable the granting of the Infernal pact attunement, which attunement itself then violates the rule (since having a Word isn't a prerequisite for Infernal Pact, whose function is to enable the user to grant the Sorcery attunement).

It's all a pretty ugly bit of post-hoc patching around the fact that the original IN core rules didn't have any category named "advantages", so when Sorcery originally was written up in the second supplement (The Marches), it was called an attunement (see also that The Marches said human "Sorcerer characters may purchase Discord to gain additional character points", because IN didn't originally have disadvantages, either).

The much cleaner approach is:

1) Make Sorcery an advantage. (Having this advantage is then Hatiphas's Word-granted power.)

2) Delete Infernal Pact.

3) Modify the Sorcerous Initiation ritual, have it grant the advantage.

Sorcerous Initiation (CPG p.46) is already a ritual in the "Special" category of rituals that can explicitly be performed by non-sorcerers. Modify the Sorcerous Initiation ritual itself to be based on a sorcerous skill, rather than the weird ad hoc Will roll, and be able to target someone other than the performer -- I suggest just stealing the mechanics directly from Symphonic Awakening above, except maybe making it a Focus/2 ritual.

Then just have demons that initiate sorcerers know the ritual, have a bunch of points in the underlying sorcerous skill, and actually perform the ritual. And oh, hey, ethereals that initiate sorcerers can do the same thing, instead of us needing a bit in Infernal Pact about there maybe being an ethereal version of the attunement.
__________________
Steven E. Ehrbar

GURPS Technomancer resources. Including The Renegade Mage's Unofficial GURPS Magic Spell Errata, last updated July 7th, 2023.
ehrbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2024, 09:04 AM   #7
xerxes
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Default Re: modifying the rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by ehrbar View Post
Greater gods (EPG p.82) are functionally Ethereal "Superiors" (complete with being unstatted). Intrusive Domain (EPG p.108) goes ahead and explicitly qualifies its effect as "giving them the functional equivalent of an attunement." rather than a real attunement, and you already need both that rare domain feature and an expenditure of power (5 CP) by the domain's master.

And, well. the only case of a Word-bound being able to grant an attunement I can recall is Hatiphas being able to grant Infernal Pact.

So we've got a CPG rules errata ("Only Word-bound celestials can grant attunements")/subsequent GMG parenthetical rule exception (p.11's "they can only come from a Superior (or a Word-bound celestial; see p. 26)") that exists to enable the granting of the Infernal pact attunement, which attunement itself then violates the rule (since having a Word isn't a prerequisite for Infernal Pact, whose function is to enable the user to grant the Sorcery attunement).

It's all a pretty ugly bit of post-hoc patching around the fact that the original IN core rules didn't have any category named "advantages", so when Sorcery originally was written up in the second supplement (The Marches), it was called an attunement (see also that The Marches said human "Sorcerer characters may purchase Discord to gain additional character points", because IN didn't originally have disadvantages, either).

The much cleaner approach is:

1) Make Sorcery an advantage. (Having this advantage is then Hatiphas's Word-granted power.)

2) Delete Infernal Pact.

3) Modify the Sorcerous Initiation ritual, have it grant the advantage.

Sorcerous Initiation (CPG p.46) is already a ritual in the "Special" category of rituals that can explicitly be performed by non-sorcerers. Modify the Sorcerous Initiation ritual itself to be based on a sorcerous skill, rather than the weird ad hoc Will roll, and be able to target someone other than the performer -- I suggest just stealing the mechanics directly from Symphonic Awakening above, except maybe making it a Focus/2 ritual.

Then just have demons that initiate sorcerers know the ritual, have a bunch of points in the underlying sorcerous skill, and actually perform the ritual. And oh, hey, ethereals that initiate sorcerers can do the same thing, instead of us needing a bit in Infernal Pact about there maybe being an ethereal version of the attunement.

Seems like a good idea. Do you think the advantage should also cost 10 points?
xerxes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2024, 02:38 PM   #8
ehrbar
 
ehrbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Default Re: modifying the rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by xerxes View Post
Seems like a good idea. Do you think the advantage should also cost 10 points?
Point costs in In Nomine are pretty arbitrary, so my general advice is to leave them alone until they cause trouble, and then freely modify them to get rid of the trouble.
__________________
Steven E. Ehrbar

GURPS Technomancer resources. Including The Renegade Mage's Unofficial GURPS Magic Spell Errata, last updated July 7th, 2023.
ehrbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.