11-05-2013, 09:06 AM | #81 |
Join Date: Aug 2007
|
Re: Gambling in 2100?
Wouldn't the emitter part of the nanites be smaller than the practical sonic wavelengths?
__________________
Fred Brackin |
11-05-2013, 11:01 AM | #82 | |
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
|
Re: Gambling in 2100?
Quote:
Of course, I think this was a reaction to E-cards that change their faces. If you have regular cards, just mark them once with something distinctive. Of course, cards are so cheap that you could just take the cards as they come out of play and replace them with new cards with the same face value in the shuffler, and that makes players handling the cards irrelevant because those cards aren't being reused. |
|
11-05-2013, 01:10 PM | #83 | |
Computer Scientist
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas
|
Re: Gambling in 2100?
Quote:
The motes can know their approximate position from seeing the card as they are emplaced. They may also be able to nanoseismically locate and communicate because at their scale conventional soundmwaves are problematic. But that's okay, because the LPI routines already loaded work with other media as well. |
|
Tags |
gambling |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|