Steve Jackson Games - Site Navigation
Home General Info Follow Us Search Illuminator Store Forums What's New Other Games Ogre GURPS Munchkin Our Games: Home

Go Back   Steve Jackson Games Forums > Roleplaying > GURPS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-24-2020, 11:04 AM   #1
AlexanderHowl
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Default Realistic Stronger Box and Crossbow

Since bows and crossbows have their own ST ratings, representing the strength of the materials that they are made from, bows and crossbows with higher ST should be costlier and heavier than bows and crossbows with lower ST. In order to represent this realistically, I propose that the cost and weight bows and crossbows should be multiplied by (Actual ST/Minimum ST) squared.

For example, a composite bow possesses a minimum ST 10, costs $900, and weighs 4 lbs. A ST 15 composite bow would cost $2,025 and weigh 9 lbs while a ST 20 composite bow would cost $3,600 and weigh 16 lbs. Each would represent the cost and weight of the stronger materials required to make the bow.

What do you think? Would you want to increase the cost and weight of stronger bows to make them more realistic or would it be needlessly complicated?
AlexanderHowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2020, 11:06 AM   #2
Turhan's Bey Company
Aluminated
 
Turhan's Bey Company's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East of the moon, west of the stars, close to buses and shopping
Default Re: Realistic Stronger Box and Crossbow

Have you read "The Deadly Spring"?
__________________
I've been making pointlessly shiny things, and I've got some gaming-related stuff as well as 3d printing designs.

Buy my Warehouse 23 stuff, dammit!
Turhan's Bey Company is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2020, 11:14 AM   #3
DouglasCole
Doctor of GURPS Ballistics
 
DouglasCole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Burnsville, MN
Default Re: Realistic Stronger Box and Crossbow

Someone else will probably jump in, but the stiffness of a beam varies as the cube of it's thickness. So if you double the thickness, it's 8x the pull to first order.

And of course it's not quite that simple due to tillering, and changes in width if you like, etc.

Even so: Doubling the ST score of the bow, quadrupling its draw weight, is only cube root of 4 times thicker: about 60%.

Given that bows tend to be fairly light (a ST 16 yew longbow from the aforementioned Pyramid 3/33 is about 1.9 lbs), going to a ST 32 bow is about 3 lbs. So it's probably a bit more calculation than you need.
__________________
Gaming Ballistic, LLC
DouglasCole is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2020, 11:27 AM   #4
Fred Brackin
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Default Re: Realistic Stronger Box and Crossbow

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexanderHowl View Post
Since bows and crossbows have their own ST ratings, representing the strength of the materials that they are made from, ?
To my knowledge this statement is not accurate. To make a stronger bow you make it thicker rather than from different materials.
__________________
Fred Brackin
Fred Brackin is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2020, 11:48 AM   #5
AlexanderHowl
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Default Re: Realistic Stronger Box and Crossbow

Yes, the increase in the strength of the materials would mean thicker materials, since thickness is related to strength. I was unaware of the cube relationship for a beam though. A ST 11 longbow possesses a center thickness of 5/8", so a ST 22 longbow would then presumably possess a center thickness of 1", as it would represent a quadrupling of the draw weight, and it would only increase the cost and weight by 1.6x. The formula would then be the cube root (square [Actual ST/Minimum ST]).

Last edited by AlexanderHowl; 06-24-2020 at 11:51 AM.
AlexanderHowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2020, 12:04 PM   #6
Anthony
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Default Re: Realistic Stronger Box and Crossbow

Quote:
Originally Posted by DouglasCole View Post
Someone else will probably jump in, but the stiffness of a beam varies as the cube of it's thickness. So if you double the thickness, it's 8x the pull to first order.

And of course it's not quite that simple due to tillering, and changes in width if you like, etc.

Even so: Doubling the ST score of the bow, quadrupling its draw weight, is only cube root of 4 times thicker: about 60%.
Incorrect. While you are correct that stiffness for a beam of a given aspect ratio varies with the cube of thickness, what that's missing is that doing so also halves the maximum safe curvature rate, and thus if you wanted the same draw length you'd need to increase the length of the bow.

In general, elastic potential energy is equal to 0.5 * strain^2 * elastic modulus * volume, and you store maximum energy in an elastic material when strain is equal to yield strain (less some safety margin), thus giving maximum energy storage of 0.5 * yield strain^2 * elastic modulus * volume (alternately, as yield strain = yield strength / elastic modulus, you can write this as 0.5 * yield strength^2 / elastic modulus). Because not all parts of a bow staff are under equal strain, the actual energy that can be stored is 1/3 of this limit for a rectangular cross-section, 1/6 for a circular cross-section.

As all of those terms are constants except volume, this tells us energy storage for a well-constructed bow is linear in total volume of elastic material, and thus linear in mass (I was writing a response to TDS at one point, never got finished with it, but my basic take is that TDS has the wrong amount of math -- it should either assume a competent bowyer and be much simpler, or it should involve calculus).
__________________
My GURPS site and Blog.
Anthony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2020, 12:05 PM   #7
Rupert
 
Rupert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wellington, NZ
Default Re: Realistic Stronger Box and Crossbow

Note that while the bow gets bigger and heavier with increased draw, the rest of a crossbow may not, because the stock is probably over-strength anyway.
__________________
Rupert Boleyn

"A pessimist is an optimist with a sense of history."
Rupert is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2020, 12:24 PM   #8
Varyon
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Default Re: Realistic Stronger Box and Crossbow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony View Post
Incorrect. While you are correct that stiffness for a beam of a given aspect ratio varies with the cube of thickness, what that's missing is that doing so also halves the maximum safe curvature rate, and thus if you wanted the same draw length you'd need to increase the length of the bow.
Does a typical bow design use the maximum (given some margin) safe draw length possible? If so, getting the same draw length would require increased length of the bow, but if not there's certainly room to play around there.
__________________
GURPS Overhaul
Varyon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2020, 12:31 PM   #9
DouglasCole
Doctor of GURPS Ballistics
 
DouglasCole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Burnsville, MN
Default Re: Realistic Stronger Box and Crossbow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Varyon View Post
Does a typical bow design use the maximum (given some margin) safe draw length possible? If so, getting the same draw length would require increased length of the bow, but if not there's certainly room to play around there.
It's going to try to come close, because you want as little moving bits of the bow as possible (which is why long) and you want them to be as light as possible (so properly tillered/tapered).
__________________
Gaming Ballistic, LLC
DouglasCole is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2020, 12:32 PM   #10
Flyndaran
Untagged
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Grove, Beaverton, Oregon
Default Re: Realistic Stronger Box and Crossbow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony View Post
...

As all of those terms are constants except volume, this tells us energy storage for a well-constructed bow is linear in total volume of elastic material, and thus linear in mass (I was writing a response to TDS at one point, never got finished with it, but my basic take is that TDS has the wrong amount of math -- it should either assume a competent bowyer and be much simpler, or it should involve calculus).
So that would have little real effect for the realistic human strength range. But it would cause a big disagreement with TDS for my low grade but realistic giant humanoids?
And I suppose those odd hobbits and their tiny "weapons"?
__________________
Beware, poor communication skills. No offense intended. If offended, it just means that I failed my writing skill check.
Flyndaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Fnords are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.